Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Protocol for Human Blastoids Modeling Blastocyst Development and Implantation
Published on: August 10, 2022
Does Prolonged Preservation of Blastocysts Affect the Implantation and Live Birth Rate? A Danish Nationwide
Tilde Veng Eskildsen1,2, Michael Due Larsen3,4, Jens Fedder1,2,5
1Fertility Clinic, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Cryopreservation technology used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) has significantly improved live birth rates by enabling multiple embryo transfers with frozen embryos from a single ovarian stimulation cycle. However, there is conflicting data on the effect of prolonged cryopreservation of human blastocysts. Methods: This Danish nationwide cohort study includes all frozen embryo transfers (FETs) from 1 January 2012 to 31 March 2019. Biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live births were analyzed based on blastocyst storage time. Blastocyst storage time was stratified into five groups, ≤3 month, 4-6 months, 7-12 months, 13-24 months, and ≥25 months, with the shortest (≤3 months) as the reference. We also examined the risk of preterm birth, small and large for gestational age (SGA and LGA), and congenital malformations among live-born children. Multivariable analysis was used to estimate the odd ratios of the reproductive outcomes, accounting for potential confounders. Results: We identified 7042 women with 12,599 FETs. Characteristics of women at embryo transfer did not vary significantly by storage time, except for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), which increased from 2.6% in the reference group to 6.7% in the ≥25-month group. The clinical pregnancy rate was 35.7%. Blastocyst storage time did not significantly affect biochemical pregnancy rates, with adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.80-1.11) to 0.96 (95% CI: 0.82-1.12) for the 13-24-month and ≥25-month groups, respectively. Clinical pregnancy rates also did not decrease with storage time (aOR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.82-1.13) for ≥25 months. The live birth rate was 28.6%, with no significant decrease during storage (aOR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.75-1.06). However, the risk of LGA was slightly, but non-significantly, increased (aOR: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.84-2.42) in the ≥25-month group, whereas the aOR of SGA and congenital malformations was not increased. Conclusions: Our data indicates that storing blastocysts for a period of 25 months does not significantly affect pregnancy chances following assisted reproductive technology treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Birth Control Methods
Role of Affect in Interpersonal Attraction
Measuring Reaction Rates
The Influence of Affect on Cognition
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Reaction Rate
The mathematical representation of the change in the concentration of reactants and products, over time, is the rate...

