Detection of Hidden Pest Rice Weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) in Wheat Kernels Using Hyperspectral Imaging
Lei Yan1,2,3, Taoying Luo1, Chao Zhao1,2,3
1School of Food and Strategic Reserves, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Abstract:
The rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) is a major pest in stored wheat, and traditional detection methods face challenges in identifying its hidden life stages within kernels. This study develops a nondestructive method to detect S. oryzae (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation in wheat kernels using hyperspectral imaging, spectral preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification modeling. Hyperspectral data were collected from wheat kernels at different infestation stages (1, 11, 21, and 25 days (d)) and from healthy kernels. Spectral quality was optimized using SG smoothing, multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), and standard normal variate transformation (SNV). Feature extraction algorithms, including Competitive Adaptive Re-weighting Algorithm (CARS), Successive Projection Algorithm (SPA), and Iterative Retention of Information Variables (IRIV), were used to reduce data dimensionality, while classification models like Decision Tree (DT), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were applied. The results show that MSC preprocessing provides the best performance among the models. After feature band selection, the MSC-CARS-SVM model achieved the highest accuracy for the 1 day and 25 d samples (95.48% and 96.61%, respectively). For the 11 d and 21 d samples, the MSC-IRIV-SPA-SVM model achieved the best performance with accuracies of 94.35% and 94.92%, respectively. This study demonstrates that MSC effectively reduces spectral noise and improves classification performance. After feature selection, the model shows significant improvements in both accuracy and stability. The study confirms the feasibility of using hyperspectral technology to identify healthy and S. oryzae-infested wheat kernels, providing theoretical support for early, nondestructive pest detection.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Detection of Black Holes
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...


