Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
Interventions to enhance in-home taking medication among older adults with multimorbidity/polypharmacy: a systematic
María Durán-Luque1, María Rocío Robles-Muñoz2, María Eugenia Velasco-García3
1Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Introduction:
Global population ageing is linked to increasing multimorbidity and polypharmacy. This shift places pressure on caregivers, who often lack training and face challenges like medication mismanagement. Our objective was to collate scientific evidence on interventions to enhance medication management among multimorbid older adults living in the community.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42024513056) following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to July 9, 2024. Eligible studies were RCTs or quasi-experimental designs involving home-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years with ≥2 chronic conditions or ≥5 medications, assessing adherence or health outcomes, and ≥30 days of follow-up. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using R. ORs (95% CI) were calculated for binary outcomes and SMDs (95% CI) for continuous variables.
Results:
Of 7,980 citations, 49 articles met the eligibility criteria, corresponding to 48 unique studies. Medication adherence measured with the MMAS-4 indicated a significant effect (OR = 1.55; 95% CI 1.08-2.28; I2 = 32.4%), while continuous measures showed no effect (SMD = 0.00; 95% CI = -0.08-0.09; I2 = 2%). Readmissions decreased at medium-term follow-up (OR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.25-0.69). Results for ED visits were inconclusive due to heterogeneity. Primary care contacts showed a weak, non-significant effect (SMD = 0.06; 95% CI = -0.04-0.16; I2 = 42%). No effect was found for quality of life or mortality. DRPs and costs lacked conclusive evidence. Most studies had a moderate to high risk of bias. Certainty of evidence was very low.
Discussion:
Interventions showed limited and variable effects. Adherence improvements were identified only for the MMAS-4, while other measures showed no benefit. A short-term reduction in readmissions was observed, but effects were not sustained, and the certainty of evidence was low. This review highlights evidence gaps, particularly the need for standardized outcomes, more sustained and multifactorial interventions, economic evaluation, and higher methodological quality, to support evidence-based policymaking and optimize future interventions.
Systematic Review Registration:
The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024513056). The registration link is: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024513056.
More Related Videos
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
06:26Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
Published on: November 27, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups