Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Primary Outcome Assessment in a Pig Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published on: October 14, 2016
Factors Affecting Outcomes of Hindfoot Fusion Nails for Acute Injury: A Multicenter Study
Eugene Kim1, Paul Tornetta1, Jon B Carlson2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Objective:
To evaluate the effect of joint preparation and patient factors on outcomes and complications in patients treated acutely with hindfoot fusion nails for ankle and pilon fractures.
Design:
Retrospective chart review.
Setting:
Thirteen US trauma centers and 2 UK trauma centers.
Patient Selection Criteria:
Ankle and pilon fractures (AO-OTA types A-C) from 2010 to 2020 acutely treated definitively with hindfoot fusion nail were reviewed. Patients at least 18 years old and with minimum 6 months follow-up or earlier diagnosis of complication were included. Exclusion criteria included nonambulatory at baseline, prior internal fixation that failed and underwent revision, and prior tibiotalar or subtalar arthrodesis.
Outcome Measurements And Comparisons:
The primary outcome was final postoperative ambulatory status. Secondary outcomes were infectious and fracture-related complications.
Results:
One hundred forty-nine patients (75 men; 74 women; age 20-99; median 63 years) were treated for ankle (104) or pilon (45; 8A, 13B, 24C) fractures. Eighty-five patients (44%) had open fractures and 55 (37%) had diabetes. Thirty-six patients (24%) had joint preparation at the time of surgery. Forty-five (30%) were made weight bearing as tolerated postoperatively; the median time to mobilize was 1.5 days (0-210) and to full weight bearing was 35 days (0-1462). Fifty-seven patients (85%) returned to their preinjury ambulatory status, which was not affected by joint preparation (50% vs. 59%, P = 0.327). Joint preparation led to higher articular fusion rates (94% vs. 24%; P = 0.001) and fewer hardware removals (19% vs. 42%, P = 0.013), but trended toward a higher fracture nonunion rate (19% vs. 8%, P = 0.053). Forty-five patients (30%) had infectious complications, 60 (40%) had a fracture-related complication, and 67 (45%) had additional procedures. Open fractures did not lead to any differences in superficial or deep infection. Insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with higher rates of infectious complications (31% vs. 15%, P = 0.028) and amputation (17% vs. 4%, P = 0.029).
Conclusions:
Hindfoot fusion nails for acute ankle and pilon injuries had high complication rates. More complications occurred in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. While 95% regained ambulation, only 57% returned to preoperative status. Joint preparation led to higher rates of articular fusion (94% vs. 24%, P < 0.001) but not fracture union (81% vs. 66%, P = 0.106).
Level Of Evidence:
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Nuclear Fusion
A helium nucleus has a mass that is 0.7% less than that of four hydrogen nuclei; this lost mass is converted into energy during the fusion. This reaction produces about...
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care

