Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

A Syngeneic Murine Model of Endometriosis using Naturally Cycling Mice
Published on: November 24, 2020
Differences in response to dienogest therapy among different phenotypes of endometriosis: A single-center
Jixiao Liu1, Dandan Wu, Jianli Sun
1Department of Gynecology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Tianjin City, China.
Abstract:
This study aims to investigate the differences in response to dienogest (DNG) therapy among patients with 3 different phenotypes of endometriosis: ovarian endometrioma (OMA), superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SUP), and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). This study was a single-center retrospective cohort analysis. A total of 501 consecutive patients with endometriosis diagnosed and treated in our hospital from January 2023 to January 2024 were enrolled and divided into the OMA group (n = 276), SUP group (n = 125), and DIE group (n = 100) based on imaging/surgical phenotypes. All patients received monotherapy with DNG (2 mg/day) for at least 6 months. Differences in pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, lesion size, serum CA125 levels, quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey), and adverse reactions before and after treatment were compared among the 3 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent influencing factors for significant pain relief (defined as ≥50% reduction in VAS score). At baseline, disease duration, revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine stage and score, CA125 levels, and pain intensity in the DIE group were significantly higher than those in the OMA and SUP groups (P < .001). After 6 months of treatment, pain VAS scores, lesion size, and CA125 levels significantly decreased from baseline in all 3 groups (P < .001). Intergroup comparisons showed statistically significant differences in the reduction of VAS scores (ΔVAS) for dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain (P < .01), with the SUP group showing the smallest improvement. Meanwhile, the lesion reduction rate in the OMA group was significantly higher than that in the SUP and DIE groups (47.5% vs 39.4% vs 37.9%, P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that, compared with the OMA phenotype, the DIE phenotype was an independent negative predictor for significant pain relief (odds ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.99, P = .046). DNG is significantly effective for all 3 endometriosis phenotypes, effectively relieving pain, reducing lesion size, and improving quality of life. However, patients with the DIE phenotype, due to the inherently more severe nature of their disease, have a relatively lower likelihood of achieving significant pain relief and a higher incidence of adverse reactions, necessitating special attention in clinical management.
Related Concept Videos
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Center of Gravity
Center of Gravity
To determine its location, the principle of moments can be utilized by dividing the object into...
Center of Mass
The knowledge of the center of mass can also help us to describe and predict the motion of objects. For example, when a ball is thrown...
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

