Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data
Published on: September 25, 2021
Deep learning and machine learning for differentiation between contrast extravasation and hemorrhagic transformation
Thiago Oscar Goulart1, Renato Okabayashi Miyaji2, Júlio César Nather Júnior3
1Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. School of Public Health, Boston, Massachussets, USA; Department of Neurology, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Machine learning models accurately differentiate contrast extravasation from hemorrhagic transformation after mechanical thrombectomy using non-contrast CT scans. These AI tools aid in critical treatment decisions for acute ischemic stroke patients.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is crucial for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) but post-procedure non-contrast CT (NCCT) findings like hyperdensities can be ambiguous.
- Distinguishing hemorrhagic transformation (HT) from contrast extravasation (CE) on NCCT is vital for guiding subsequent anticoagulation therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for differentiating HT from CE on NCCT within 6 hours post-MT.
- To assess the performance of radiomics-based (SVM, RF, LR) and deep learning (U-Net) models in this classification task.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 351 AIS patients undergoing MT, with 111 showing post-MT hyperdensities classified by follow-up CT.
- Training ML models (SVM, RF, LR, U-Net) on segmented hyperdensities or raw axial slices from a subset of patients.
- Testing model performance on a separate cohort using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC.
Main Results:
- U-Net achieved the highest accuracy (96%) and F1-score (0.96).
- All models demonstrated high performance; U-Net and Logistic Regression showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for CE (100%).
- U-Net significantly outperformed Random Forest, but performance was comparable to SVM and Logistic Regression.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning models applied to NCCT are effective in distinguishing CE from HT post-MT.
- Deep learning (U-Net) and traditional ML models show comparable diagnostic utility.
- Further research with larger cohorts and hybrid approaches is recommended.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Purposive Learning
Observational Learning
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Introduction to Learning
In contrast to learned behaviors, unlearned behaviors such as crying, sexual...

