Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
Published on: February 23, 2024
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines on the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS)
Simon Ouellet1, Maria Cécilia Gallani2, Sarah-Eve St-Pierre3
1Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, 1050 Avenue de la Médecine, Québec City, Quebec G1V 0A6, Canada; Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR), 300, allée des Ursulines, Rimouski, Québec G5L 3A1, Canada.
Aim:
Identify quality indicators for nursing triage outlined in the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) guidelines and describe the skills and professional attributes required for nurses to perform high-quality triage.
Data Sources:
Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and 37 professional association websites.
Methods:
This systematic review included CTAS guidelines published between January 1990 and August 2025. Guideline quality was appraised using the AGREE II tool. Quality indicators and nursing skills were standardized, grouped into conceptual categories, and their frequency was documented.
Result:
Nine guidelines were included, all of which were low quality. Twelve key quality indicator categories were identified. Of these, 100% of guidelines required that triage report chief complaints, objective clinical assessment, use of CTAS modifiers, and triage acuity levels. Documentation of the mode of arrival to the emergency department (22%) and infection risk screening and control measures (11%) were the quality indicators least reported on. Nursing skills were grouped into three core areas. The first was knowledge, encompassing clinical proficiency in physical and mental health as well as familiarity with ethical and legal concepts. The second comprised clinical skills, namely advanced judgment, therapeutic communication and accurate record keeping. The third focused on behavioral and professional attitudes, emphasizing empathy, confidence and autonomy.
Conclusion:
These findings underscore the need to reinforce triage quality through education, audit tools, and monitoring. Given the low quality of existing guidelines, future consensus efforts are needed to validate and refine indicators, providing a foundation for improving triage quality.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
pH Scale
Random and Systematic Errors
Guidelines for Sketching a Curve
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

