Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
FFR-Guided Complete versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in Patients With Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
Tara Seirafi1, Tetiana Zolotarova2, Jeremy Y Levett3
1Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital/McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Insights
Fractional flow-reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) reduces unplanned revascularizations. This strategy may also decrease major adverse cardiac events (MACE) compared to culprit-only treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Optimal revascularization strategy for patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) remains debated.
- Fractional flow-reserve (FFR) guidance aims to optimize treatment decisions in complex coronary artery disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of FFR-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in reducing major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with MI and multivessel CAD.
- To evaluate the impact of FFR-guided complete revascularization on specific MACE components, including all-cause death, MI, and unplanned revascularization.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library.
- Inclusion of 3 RCTs with a total of 3,054 patients with MI and multivessel CAD.
- Pooled analysis using random-effects models to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for primary and secondary outcomes.
Main Results:
- FFR-guided complete revascularization was associated with a trend towards reduced MACE (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.37-1.05).
- A significant reduction in unplanned revascularization events was observed with FFR-guided complete revascularization (RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.21-0.87).
- No significant difference in the risk of recurrent MI or major bleeding was noted between the groups.
Conclusions:
- FFR-guided complete revascularization during index hospitalization significantly reduces unplanned revascularizations in patients with MI and multivessel CAD.
- This strategy may offer a potential benefit in reducing overall MACE, warranting further investigation.
- The findings support the consideration of FFR-guided complete revascularization in selected patient populations.
Abstract:
In patients with myocardial infarctions (MI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), the effect of fractional flow-reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization during index hospitalization versus culprit-only revascularization remains unclear. Our objective is to determine whether FFR-guided complete revascularization during index hospitalization reduces major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among patients with MI and multivessel CAD. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FFR-guided complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with MI and multivessel CAD. The primary outcome was MACE, as defined by a composite endpoint of all-cause death, MI or unplanned revascularization, at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Count data were pooled across trials using random-effects models to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 3 RCTs (n = 3,054) were included. The majority (77.5%) of participants were male. The pooled RR of MACE for FFR-guide complete versus culprit-only revascularization was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.37-1.05; I2 = 90%). FFR-guided complete revascularization was associated with reduced unplanned revascularization events, with a pooled RR 0.43 (95% CI: 0.21-0.87; I2 = 88%). There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrent MI (RR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.61-1.33; I2 =30%). The risk of major bleeding was low in both FFR-guided complete (23/1373) and culprit-only (29/1681) revascularization groups across the 3 trials. In conclusion, in patients with MI and multivessel CAD, FFR-guided complete revascularization during the index hospitalization reduces the risk of unplanned revascularizations and may reduce the risk of MACE compared to culprit-only revascularization.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

