Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
Emergency Department Use of Ocular Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Its Utility in Diagnosis at a Tertiary Academic
Andres M Dones1, Jeremy B Hatcher2, Maro Doce1
1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Purpose:
To determine whether the use of ocular point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) impacts emergency department (ED) need for referral to ophthalmology.
Design:
Retrospective, cross-sectional study.
Participants:
The study included 282 patients who presented at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) ED between January 1, 2021, and October 31, 2024, with an eye-related chief symptom and received both an ocular POCUS and ED or outpatient ophthalmology consultation within 1 week.
Methods:
We collected data from the patient's electronic health record on whether the patient was referred to ophthalmology, the diagnosis made by POCUS, and the diagnosis made by the ophthalmologist.
Main Outcome Measures:
The study's primary outcomes were the percentage of patients referred to an ophthalmologist, the agreement between the diagnosis made by ocular POCUS and the ophthalmologist, and the sensitivity and specificity of POCUS in diagnosing retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, posterior vitreous detachment, and nonvitreoretinal pathology. Secondary outcomes included the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of POCUS in diagnosing the previously described pathologies.
Results:
Of the patients who received a POCUS, 91.5% were referred to ophthalmology, including 82.6% of patients with an unremarkable POCUS result. There was moderate agreement between the diagnosis made by POCUS and ophthalmology (k = 0.48, P < 0.01). Point-of-care ultrasound had a high sensitivity for detecting vitreoretinal pathology, such as retinal detachments (sensitivity [sn] = 93.8%, specificity [sp] = 93.8%) and vitreous hemorrhages (sn = 73.0%, sp = 92.8%). However, the sensitivity for detecting nonvitreoretinal pathology was lower (sn = 13.3%, sp = 99.5%). There were several vision-threatening conditions that were not diagnosed by POCUS.
Conclusions:
Our data show that the results of ocular POCUS had minimal impact on the need for patients to be seen by an ophthalmologist at a tertiary academic center. Furthermore, although POCUS does have a high sensitivity for detecting retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage, it has only moderate accuracy and a low sensitivity for detecting other ocular pathologies that may require prompt intervention, most importantly retinal vascular disease and ischemic optic neuropathy, thereby limiting its use as a diagnostic tool.
Financial Disclosure(S):
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Tertiary Healthcare System
Emerging Adulthood
Nomenclature of Secondary and Tertiary Amines

