Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Primary Outcome Assessment in a Pig Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published on: October 14, 2016
Bimekizumab efficacy using IHS4 outcomes in hidradenitis suppurativa: Results from BE HEARD I and II
Thrasyvoulos Tzellos1,2, Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis1,3, Kelsey R van Straalen4
1European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation (EHSF) e.V, Dessau, Germany.
Background:
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, relapsing, debilitating skin disease characterized by deep-seated nodules, abscesses and tunnels.
Objectives:
To investigate the efficacy of bimekizumab using International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) outcomes in patients with moderate to severe HS in the pooled BE HEARD I and II Phase 3 studies.
Methods:
Patients received (initial/maintenance) bimekizumab 320 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W)/Q2W, bimekizumab Q2W/every 4 weeks (Q4W), bimekizumab Q4W/Q4W or placebo/bimekizumab Q2W. Change from baseline (CfB) in IHS4, IHS4 severity stages and the dichotomous IHS4-55/75/90/100 (an improvement of at least 55%/75%/90%/100% in IHS4 from baseline) are reported to Week 48. Lesion count data by lesion type are reported to Week48.
Results:
In total, 1014 patients were enrolled across BE HEARD I and II. At baseline, mean (standard deviation [SD]) IHS4 for bimekizumab-treated patients ranged from 33.4 (25.4) for bimekizumab Q2W/Q2W to 36.0 (34.0) for bimekizumab Q2W/Q4W versus 30.6 (21.8) for placebo. At Week16, patients receiving bimekizumab demonstrated greater reductions in mean (SD) IHS4 from baseline, ranging from -17.2 (24.8) for bimekizumab Q4W/Q4W to -17.8 (21.1) for bimekizumab Q2W/Q2W versus -6.1 (16.3) for placebo. Proportions of patients with severe HS at baseline ranged from 83.7% (bimekizumab Q2W/Q2W) to 88.4% (bimekizumab Q2W/Q4W) and decreased by ~50% to Week48 across all treatment arms, ranging from 28.6% (placebo/bimekizumab Q2W) to 34.3% (bimekizumab Q2W/Q2W). Proportions of patients with IHS4 = 0 at Week48 ranged from 23.7% (bimekizumab Q2W/Q4W) to 26.7% (placebo/bimekizumab Q2W). At Week16, IHS4-55, IHS4-75, IHS4-90 and IHS4-100 thresholds were achieved by greater proportions of patients treated with bimekizumab versus placebo, while comparable improvements were seen across treatment arms from Week16 to Week48. At Week16, lesion counts were lower for patients treated with bimekizumab versus placebo, decreasing to comparable numbers across all groups at Week48.
Conclusions:
Bimekizumab-treated patients showed improvements across IHS4 outcome measures.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Efficacy
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
Blind Procedures

