Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Use of Electromagnetic Navigational Transthoracic Needle Aspiration E-TTNA for Sampling of Lung Nodules
Published on: May 23, 2015
Navigating harm reduction and security mandates: Prison leadership perspectives on implementing prison needle
Lise Lafferty1, Nashira Popovic2, Elise Weiss2
1Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Background:
Prison needle exchange programs (PNEPs) reduce bloodborne virus transmission among people who inject drugs, yet global implementation remains limited. Canada introduced PNEPs in 2018, but uptake is low, and barriers to implementation persist. While perspectives of correctional officers, healthcare workers, and incarcerated individuals have been examined, little is known about how prison leadership shapes program delivery. Drawing on interviews informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we sought to identify the organisational, system, and structural/policy-level barriers to PNEP implementation from the perspectives of prison administrators.
Methods:
Between January and March 2025, 27 prison leaders from custodial and medical services from nine Canadian federal prisons with operational PNEPs participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were thematically analysed using the EPIS framework.
Results:
Implementation was shaped by structural tensions between harm reduction goals and "zero tolerance" custodial mandates. Outer context factors, especially union resistance, lack of policy clarity, and federal directives, created misalignment and ambiguity in program ownership. Prison climate, staff turnover, and leadership engagement influenced shifts in attitudes toward PNEPs over time. Healthcare personnel, though central to delivery, were often tasked with communicating custodial decisions, undermining trust. Intervention fit was shaped by security classification and perceived drug use patterns, with PNEPs viewed as ill-suited for minimum-security settings. Sites that streamlined approval processes and designated leadership roles were better positioned to support program uptake. Time, experiential exposure, and tailored education were key facilitators of cultural change and implementation readiness.
Conclusion:
Addressing outer context barriers and clarifying responsibilities between health and corrections are critical to PNEP sustainability. Leadership engagement is essential to enabling system-wide adoption.
More Related Videos
11:38High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
Published on: May 10, 2016
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Social Exchange Theory
Gas Exchange and Transport
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Personality
Psychodynamic theorists argue that unconscious...
Oxidation-Reduction Reactions
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.