Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

A Rapid Method for Modeling a Variable Cycle Engine
Published on: August 13, 2019
Interobserver variability of recall decisions between mammography readers in the English NHS breast screening
Laura Quinn1, David Jenkinson2, Sian Taylor-Phillips3
1Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, UK.
Objectives:
To evaluate interobserver variability between mammogram readers' recall decisions in the English NHS breast screening programme, comparing different variability measures.
Methods:
Data from 401,682 women in 22 NHS centres who underwent mammographic screening interpreted independently by two mammogram readers were included. Percentage agreement, prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted-kappa (PABAK), Gwet's agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC) and Cohen's kappa were reported with 95% confidence intervals. Analyses were performed separately for women at first and subsequent screening appointments, by cancer diagnosis, reader recall rates and age group.
Results:
Of 86,287 women at first screening, 6,491 (7.5%) were recalled, compared to 9,488 (3.0%) of 315,395 at subsequent screenings. Percentage agreement, Gwet's AC, and PABAK were lower for first screening than subsequent (93.6%, 95%CI: 93.4-93.7 vs 97.2%, 95%CI: 97.2-97.3), (92.3, 95%CI:92.1 to 92.5 vs 97.0, 95% CI: 97.0 to 97.1) and (87.2, 95%CI: 86.9-87.4 vs 94.4, 95%CI: 94.3-94.5), whereas Cohen's kappa, which is biased downwards when prevalence of recall is lower, did not change (61.6, 95%CI: 60.7-62.5 vs 61.8, 95%CI: 61.0-62.5). Percentage agreement, Gwet's AC, and PABAK were lower for women with cancer detected than without, but Cohen's kappa showed the opposite pattern, driven by prevalence bias. Percentage agreement, Gwet's AC, and PABAK were lower when one/both readers had high recall rates, but Cohen's kappa showed no important pattern.
Conclusions:
Percentage agreement, Gwet's AC, and PABAK showed lower agreement for interpreting the more challenging first screen, without assistance of previous mammograms, when women had cancer and when one/both readers had a high recall rate. Cohen's kappa was heavily distorted by outcome prevalence. Despite widespread use, Cohen's kappa is inappropriate for low prevalence settings such as screening, or making comparisons when prevalence varies.
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Graphs of Equations in Two Variables
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence
Work and Energy for Variable Forces
Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables

