Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving Sleep Quality and Quantity in Hospitalized Patients With Melatonin: A Quality Improvement Project at HCA (Hospital Corporation of America) Oak Hill Hospital.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Recurrent, Acute Limb Ischemia Secondary to Arterial Thrombosis: A Devastating Complication in the Setting of Severe COVID-19 Infection.

HCA healthcare journal of medicine·2025
Same author

Centroparietal Alpha/Beta Asymmetry in Response to Urgency Elicited by Upper Body Vibration.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2025
Same author

Analyzing handwriting legibility through hand kinematics.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2025
Same author

BandFocusNet: A Lightweight Model for Motor Imagery Classification of a Supernumerary Thumb in Virtual Reality.

IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

Neuro-motor controlled wearable augmentations: current research and emerging trends.

Frontiers in neurorobotics·2024
Same journal

Evaluation of an open-face 8-channel transmit 64-channel receive 7T head coil for neuroimaging.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Acoustic stimulation in pain management: neurobiological mechanisms and clinical applications-a narrative review.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Local brain connectome parameters across the spectrum of clinical cognitive decline.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Body mass index affects EEG microstate dynamics through blood viscosity in high-altitude environments.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Disrupted glymphatic function and its relationship with sleep and cognitive impairment in ME/CFS assessed via DTI-ALPS.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Neuromorphic-inspired multi-view global-local fusion for IR-UWB radar dynamic gesture recognition.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans
04:27

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Published on: March 15, 2019

11.9K

Evaluating haptic experience using EEG and deep learning across multiple modalities: linking stimulus and

Haneen Alsuradi1, Yonas Atinafu2, Mohamad Eid1

  • 1Engineering Division, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|February 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study shows that using physical stimulation (PS) parameters to train brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for haptic feedback is more effective than using self-reported (SR) perceptions. PS-trained models offer stable and higher performance for adaptive haptic interfaces.

Keywords:
EEGcognitive-interfacedeep-learninghapticsself-report

More Related Videos

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
13:57

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

13.2K
Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

44.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans
04:27

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Published on: March 15, 2019

11.9K
Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
13:57

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

13.2K
Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

44.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Traditional haptic interface evaluations use subjective self-reports, limiting objectivity and real-time adaptation.
  • Cognitive haptic interfaces utilize neurophysiological measures like electroencephalography (EEG) and deep learning for objective assessment.
  • A critical challenge lies in labeling neural responses: using physical stimulation (PS) parameters or self-reported (SR) perceptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically investigate the impact of PS- versus SR-based labeling on deep learning model performance for EEG-based haptic feedback.
  • To compare the effectiveness of PS and SR labeling schemes across four haptic feedback modalities.
  • To determine how labeling impacts model stability and accuracy in decoding neural responses to haptic stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Trained deep learning models (ATCNet, EEG Inception, EEG Conformer) using EEG data labeled by both PS parameters and SR perceptions.
  • Evaluated model performance across four haptic modalities: delayed force-feedback (DFF), fingertip vibration feedback (FVF), upper-body vibration feedback (UVF), and fingertip thermal feedback (FTF).
  • Employed a group-level leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) cross-validation strategy to assess model generalizability.

Main Results:

  • Models trained with PS labeling consistently demonstrated more stable and higher performance compared to SR-labeled models across all tested modalities.
  • The performance gains for PS-labeled models were most pronounced at near-perceptual-threshold stimulation levels, where SR labels exhibit greater inter-individual variability.
  • EEG-based models aligned more closely with physical stimulation parameters than subjective reports, particularly in ambiguous perceptual conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Physical stimulation (PS) labeling provides a more robust and objective approach for training deep learning models in cognitive haptic interfaces compared to self-reported (SR) labeling.
  • PS-trained decoders serve as effective foundational representations for haptic feedback systems, adaptable with user-specific SR data.
  • This research supports the use of PS-grounded models for developing more reliable and adaptive haptic interfaces, especially in challenging perceptual regimes.