Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026
Experimental Protocol for Examining Behavioral Response Profiles in Larval Fish: Application to the Neuro-stimulant Caffeine
Published on: July 24, 2018
Systematic analysis of biological endpoint variability and implications for quantitative modeling of the FLASH
Isabella Colizzi1,2, Mathilde Toschini1,2, Antony J Lomax1,2
1Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, PSI, Switzerland.
Background And Purpose:
Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy shows promise in sparing normal tissue while maintaining tumor control. However, heterogeneity across preclinical experiments limits cross-study comparability and the development of predictive models. By employing both qualitative and quantitative analyses, we aim to identify variability in endpoints, clarify inconsistencies, and highlight knowledge gaps critical for future quantitative modeling.
Material And Methods:
We reviewed in-vivo proton and electron FLASH murine experiments (1966-2024) and extracted commonly reported endpoints. A subset of comparable endpoints-crypt cell ratio and survival (abdominal), maximum moist desquamation (skin), and Novel-Object-Recognition tests (brain)-was analyzed using qualitative comparison and logistic regression to assess parameters potentially driving the FLASH effect.
Results:
Fifty papers were reviewed, revealing substantial differences in endpoint selection, timing, and methodology. Most endpoints were not directly comparable across studies, with only four endpoints amenable to cross-study analysis. Logistic regression was constrained by high collinearity among parameters, reflecting both experimental heterogeneity and limited harmonization.
Conclusion:
Our review highlights the urgent need for standardization in biological endpoints and methodologies in FLASH research. By quantifying variability in preclinical FLASH data and identifying comparable endpoints, our work provides essential guidance for future modeling efforts, bridging biological evidence and quantitative approaches for treatment planning applications.
More Related Videos
09:33Imaging Approaches to Assessments of Toxicological Oxidative Stress Using Genetically-encoded Fluorogenic Sensors
Published on: February 7, 2018
05:47In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
01:26Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:15Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model
01:23Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
00:59Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
01:20Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods