Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

06:44
Deep Vein Thrombosis Induced by Stasis in Mice Monitored by High Frequency Ultrasonography
Published on: April 13, 2018
10.5K
Prediction model for deep vein thrombosis stability based on multiple machine learning methods.
Yaxi Yu1, Min Wang1, Jianxia Song1
1Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, China.
Phlebology
|February 16, 2026
Summary
Machine learning models effectively predict deep vein thrombosis (DVT) stability using clinical data and computed tomography (CT) texture features. The logistic regression model demonstrated superior performance in identifying DVT stability, aiding clinical decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Machine Learning
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) poses a significant risk, with stability being a crucial factor in predicting outcomes like acute pulmonary embolism (APE).
- Accurate prediction of DVT stability is essential for timely and appropriate clinical intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and compare multiple machine learning (ML) models for predicting DVT stability.
- To identify the optimal model utilizing clinical and computed tomography (CT) texture features for DVT stability prediction.
Main Methods:
- 108 patients with DVT were analyzed, categorizing them into stable (no APE) and unstable (with APE) groups.
- CT texture features were extracted from thrombus regions, and clinical data were collected.
- Four ML algorithms (logistic regression, SVM, KNN, XGBoost) were trained and validated using a combination of clinical and CT texture features.
Main Results:
- The logistic regression (LR) model achieved the highest prediction performance.
- LR model metrics included an AUC of 0.87, accuracy of 0.79, precision of 0.75, recall of 0.80, and specificity of 0.87.
- The LR model demonstrated superior predictive capability compared to SVM, KNN, and XGBoost models.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning models integrating clinical and CT texture features can reliably predict DVT stability.
- The developed ML models, particularly the LR model, offer a promising tool for assessing DVT stability and guiding patient management.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
383
Venous thrombosis requires effective prevention and treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes and reduce potential complications.Prevention StrategiesHealthcare providers must prioritize preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) for all adult patients upon admission. Interventions depend on bleeding and thrombosis risk, medical history, current medications, diagnoses, planned procedures, and patient preferences. Patients on bed rest should change positions every two hours and, if not...
383
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
355
The key difference between Superficial Vein Thrombosis (SVT) and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) lies in their location and severity.Clinical ManifestationsSVT typically presents with localized pain, tenderness, and redness along the course of a superficial vein, often accompanied by a palpable, cord-like structure under the skin. This condition is usually less dangerous than DVT but can be uncomfortable and may lead to complications such as cellulitis or, rarely, a clot extension into the deep...
355
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
504
Venous thrombosis, the most common disorder of the veins, involves the formation of a thrombus or blood clot associated with vein inflammation. It can be classified as either superficial vein thrombosis or deep vein thrombosis.Superficial Vein Thrombosis: This involves the formation of a thrombus in a superficial vein, usually the greater or lesser saphenous vein. Though less severe than deep vein thrombosis (DVT), SVT can lead to complications if untreated.Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT): This...
504
