Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Procedural sedation in emergency departments: Efficacy and adverse outcomes from a systematic review and
Zhijun Qu1, Chengshi Xu1, Zhijie Qu2
1Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China.
Background:
Procedural sedation reduces pain, anxiety, and discomfort during emergency department (ED) procedures. Analgesics, sedatives and anxiolytics ensure patient comfort but can cause respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects.
Objectives:
To synthesize data on adverse events and procedural efficacy from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the use of different drugs/drug combinations used for procedural sedation.
Material And Methods:
A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases for RCTs that involved adult patients who were administered drugs for procedural sedation in the ED. Outcomes such as hypoxia, hypotension, apnea, agitation, GI disturbances (nausea, vomiting), and bradycardia/dysrhythmia were extracted from the trials. A meta-analysis was performed using OpenMeta (Analyst) software to determine the pooled incidence of each adverse outcome and procedural success for the different drugs and drug combinations.
Results:
A total of 50 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis with information from 5,398 patients. Meta-analysis of the data showed a pooled incidence of 136 events/1,000 sedations (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 112-160) for hypoxia, 23 events/1,000 sedations (95% CI: 15-31) for hypotension, 143 events/1,000 sedations (95% CI: 110-177) for agitation, 51 events/1,000 sedations (95% CI: 38-64) for apnea, 45 events/1,000 sedations (95% CI: 30-60) for GI disturbances, and 30 events/1,000 sedations (95% CI: 19-41) for bradycardia/dysrhythmia. The procedural success rate was 921 events/1,000 sedations (95% CI: 896-946).
Conclusion:
The results of this meta-analysis shed light on the adverse effects of various procedural sedation agents used for different procedures in the ED. Ketamine-propofol combinations were associated with less hemodynamic instability, whereas propofol caused hypotension and respiratory events and GI disturbances were associated with the administration of fentanyl and ketamine. Thus, individual patient factors such as age and comorbidities and the risk profile of different agents should be considered during procedural sedation protocols. This meta-analysis summarizes the side effects of several drugs to help physicians administer them safely.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Stages of General Anesthesia
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Sedatives and Hypnotics: Overview
Sedative-hypnotics are categorized into barbiturates, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and non-benzodiazepines or Z-drugs. These drugs work by suppressing central nervous system activity, and this suppression is dose-dependent. Older sedative medications, like barbiturates, follow a linear curve in...
