A multi-dimensional index of rurality in Chile and its association with infant and neonatal mortality
Carlos Flores-Angulo1, Guillermo Marshall2, Catterina Ferreccio3
1Programa de Epidemiología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Santiago, Chile. Centro para la Prevención y el Control del Cáncer. Santiago, Chile.. cjflores1@uc.cl.
Objective:
To construct a multi-dimensional Index of Relative Rurality (IRR) for Chile and assess its association with infant and neonatal mortality.
Materials And Methods:
A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from 343 municipalities. The IRR was calculated using four standardized components-population size, population density, urban population proportion, and travel time to service-rich areas-to reflect the complexity of rurality in Chile. Associations between the IRR and mortality outcomes were evaluated using negative binomial regression and generalized additive models.
Results:
A rurality threshold was identified at approximately IRR= 0.404, beyond which the risk of infant and neonatal mortality increased notably. Municipalities with IRR values >0.50 showed elevated risks of infant mortality (RR: 1.18; 95%CI: 1.01,1.38) and neonatal mortality (RR: 1.27; 95%CI: 1.06,1.50), compared to more urban areas. While the official classification defined nearly half of municipalities as rural, the IRR captured a smaller, more specific subset of municipalities with higher mortality risk-particularly in southern macrozones.
Conclusions:
The IRR offers a more precise and data-driven approach to characterizing rurality and identifying health disparities. Its continuous design improves the detection of high-risk populations and challenges the overgeneralization of current classifications. These findings support the use of the IRR to inform targeted public health interventions and equitable policy planning.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Midrange
Simply put, the midrange is half of the data set’s range. Similar to the mean, the midrange is sensitive to the extreme values and hence the prospective outliers. However, unlike the mean, the midrange is not sensitive to all the values of the data set that lie in the middle. Thus, it is prone to...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Regression Toward the Mean
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Relative Risk
z Scores and Area Under the Curve


