Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
A Taxonomy for Assessing Real-World Targeted Cancer Therapy Options in the Context of Broad Genomic Profiling
Xiao Wang1,2, Jessica B Long2,3, John Rothen2,3
11Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Background:
Broad genomic profiling (BGP) is increasingly used to determine eligibility of molecularly targeted cancer therapies. Understanding the population-level impact of BGP on treatment selection requires a clinically oriented framework guiding interpretation of the guideline-directed actionability of BGP results.
Methods:
We developed the Yale Molecular Alteration Taxonomy for Real-World Individualized Treatments (Y-MATRIX) to classify BGP results in relation to contemporaneous FDA approvals and NCCN Guidelines. We then applied our schema to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and assessed temporal changes in the distribution of alteration categories using a large, nationwide database of patients with aNSCLC diagnosed from 2017 to 2023.
Results:
Y-MATRIX classifies molecular testing results as categories A (first-line option), B (later-line option), C (off-label, guideline-concordant option), D (off-label, guideline-discordant option), E (no actionable alterations), or X (no alterations detected). In a sample of 8,717 patients with aNSCLC (median age, 69 years; 49.2% female), the proportion of patients in category A/B increased from 15.8% in 2017 to 33.6% in 2023, driven predominantly by an increase in later-line therapies (category B, 0% to 15.2%). Patients in category C/D increased from 21.2% to 39.3%, whereas patients in category E/X decreased markedly from 63.1% to 27.1%. Nonsmoking status, younger age, and nonsquamous histology were associated with having category A alterations.
Conclusions:
Y-MATRIX provided a comprehensive taxonomy of BGP results by clinical actionability and demonstrates the increasing actionability of BGP results as the aNSCLC treatment landscape evolved over time. There was an increase in patients with category C and D findings, representing a diverse set of clinical circumstances of unclear actionability with opportunities for both innovative and potentially inappropriate targeted therapy use. The Y-MATRIX schema can be applied to facilitate research on all cancers, including the study of alterations across strata of targetable potential and the clinical utility of molecular profiling in precision oncology over time.
Insights
Broad genomic profiling (BGP) increasingly identifies actionable cancer alterations. The Y-MATRIX framework shows a rise in actionable results for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), highlighting evolving treatment options.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Precision Medicine
Background:
- Broad genomic profiling (BGP) is crucial for identifying molecularly targeted cancer therapies.
- A framework is needed to interpret BGP results for clinical decision-making and population-level impact assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and apply the Yale Molecular Alteration Taxonomy for Real-World Individualized Treatments (Y-MATRIX) framework.
- To classify BGP results and assess temporal trends in their actionability for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC).
Main Methods:
- Developed Y-MATRIX to categorize BGP results based on FDA approvals and NCCN Guidelines.
- Applied Y-MATRIX to a nationwide database of aNSCLC patients diagnosed between 2017 and 2023.
- Analyzed changes in the distribution of alteration categories over time.
Main Results:
- Y-MATRIX categorizes results into A (first-line), B (later-line), C (off-label, guideline-concordant), D (off-label, guideline-discordant), E (no actionable alterations), and X (no alterations detected).
- The proportion of patients with category A/B alterations in aNSCLC increased from 15.8% in 2017 to 33.6% in 2023.
- Category C/D findings increased, while category E/X decreased, indicating growing BGP actionability. Younger age, nonsmoking status, and nonsquamous histology were linked to category A alterations.
Conclusions:
- Y-MATRIX provides a comprehensive taxonomy for BGP results, demonstrating increased actionability over time in aNSCLC.
- The rise in category C/D findings suggests complex clinical scenarios with potential for both innovative and inappropriate targeted therapy use.
- The Y-MATRIX schema can aid research into molecular profiling's clinical utility across cancers in the era of precision oncology.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Cancer

