Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.

Biodiversity and Human Values

Biodiversity and Human Values

Human civilization relies on biodiversity in many ways. Sudden changes in species biodiversity result in environmental changes that can modify weather patterns and therefore human civilizations.

In-vitro Mutagenesis

In-vitro Mutagenesis

To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Tethered agonist- and GAIN domain-independent signaling of an adhesion GPCR.

Science advances·2026

Same author

Artificial intelligence in medicine: from molecular data analysis to clinical decision-making.

Croatian medical journal·2026

Same author

Pattern separation memory requires Cerebellin 4 - Neogenin 1 signaling at dentate gyrus synapses.

Progress in neurobiology·2026

Same author

Hippocampal place code plasticity in CA1 requires postsynaptic membrane fusion.

Neuron·2026

Same author

Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors.

Pharmacological reviews·2026

Same author

Munc13-1 couples DAG and Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling to dynamic vesicle priming, synaptic short-term plasticity, and posttetanic potentiation.

Science advances·2026

Same journal

Contribution of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors to bottom-up amplification of frontal and parietal cortical responses to rare deviant tones in rats.

Neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Developmental switch of GABAergic signaling in starburst amacrine cells driven by chloride transporter dynamics.

Neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Epileptiform discharges are associated with increased theta activity over time in patients with Lewy body dementia.

Neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Response times from gap detection threshold testing relate to cognitive processing speed in young adults.

Neuroscience·2026

Same journal

The timing of visual selective attention in fronto-parietal network: TMS behavioral and brain structural evidence.

Neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Effects of silencing tuberomammillary nucleus histidine decarboxylase-lineage neurons on behavioral responses in a mouse model of motion sickness.

Neuroscience·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

Scientific publishing, science integrity, and PubPeer.

Thomas C Südhof¹

¹HHMI & Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94027, USA.

|February 16, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Public distrust in science stems from integrity issues in scientific papers. Reforming science communication and publishing is crucial to restore public trust and directly address integrity concerns.

Keywords:

PubPeer Science Integrity Scientific Publishing

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Published on: September 22, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Published on: September 22, 2021

Area of Science:

Scientific integrity
Publication ethics
Science communication

Background:

Growing public distrust in science is fueled by integrity issues in scientific publications.
Increased scrutiny of published research, exemplified by platforms like PubPeer, highlights errors and raises concerns.
Contradictory findings and high retraction rates undermine confidence in scientific papers.

Purpose of the Study:

To discuss underlying causes of current science integrity problems.
To propose potential solutions for enhancing scientific credibility.
To advocate for community-driven reforms in science.

Main Methods:

This perspective synthesizes observations on science integrity.
It analyzes the impact of publication practices on public trust.
It proposes a community-based approach to address integrity issues.

Main Results:

Integrity issues in scientific papers are a primary driver of public distrust.
Current science communication and publishing models are insufficient to maintain trust.
Direct management and rectification of integrity issues are necessary.

Conclusions:

Reforming science communication and publishing is essential for regaining public trust.
Scientists must collectively address integrity problems to uphold scientific credibility.
Proactive management of scientific errors is vital for the future of science.