Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Effects of multimodal prehabilitation on surgery outcomes: prospective stepped-wedge, hospital-wide implementation
Luuk D Drager1, Femke Atsma2, Dieuwke Strijker1
1Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Background:
Multimodal prehabilitation may improve surgical outcomes in selected populations, but its real-world effectiveness remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hospital-wide implementation of multimodal prehabilitation on postoperative complications and length of hospital stay in a diverse surgical population.
Methods:
This single-centre, non-randomized stepped-wedge study (F4S PREHAB) was conducted at Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands from March 2019 to April 2024. Patients who underwent elective surgery across 20 clinical pathways received either standard preoperative care or multimodal prehabilitation comprising supervised exercise, nutritional support, psychological counselling, and smoking and alcohol cessation support. The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of postoperative complications within 30 days, with assessment of Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥II complications and the dichotomized Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). The secondary outcome was the length of hospital stay. Analyses used generalized linear models adjusted for time of inclusion and clinical pathway, as well as other confounders in some models. Subgroup analyses focused on patients who underwent high-risk gastrointestinal (GI) oncological surgery.
Results:
During the study interval, 4131 patients received usual care (2660 patients) or prehabilitation (1471 patients). A total of 367 patients (24.9%) attended at least nine exercise sessions, indicating partial adherence. No significant differences between groups were found with regard to postoperative CD grade ≥II complications (adjusted risk ratio 1.02 (95% c.i. 0.90 to 1.16)) and CCI >22.6 (adjusted risk ratio 1.03 (95% c.i. 0.86 to 1.23)) or length of hospital stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.04 (95% c.i. 0.92 to 1.18)). In the high-risk GI oncological surgery subgroup (1230 patients), the relative reduction in CD grade ≥II complication risk was 9%, but this was not statistically significant (adjusted risk ratio 0.91 (95% c.i. 0.75 to 1.10)).
Conclusion:
Hospital-wide implementation of multimodal prehabilitation did not reduce postoperative complications or length of hospital stay. A greater effect in high-risk patients suggests a targeted approach may be more effective. Future research should identify such patients and evaluate effectiveness of prehabilitation in this population.
More Related Videos
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024
06:58A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
Published on: November 6, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management