Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026
Modified Most Probable Number Assay to Quantify Salmonella in Raw and Ready-to-Cook Chicken Products
Published on: January 31, 2025
Statistical methods for predicting the presence of Salmonella Typhi in wastewater samples at Asante Akyem Agogo,
Sampson Twumasi-Ankrah1, Michael Owusu2, Michael Owusu-Ansah3
1Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Background:
Monitoring wastewater is vital for tracking typhoid fever in endemic areas. This study evaluated the performance of both spatial and non-spatial models in predicting Salmonella Typhi detection in wastewater from the Asante Akim North district in Ghana and identified key environmental risk factors.
Methods:
We collected wastewater samples of Moore swabs at 40 sites across Agogo, Juansa, Hwidiem, and Domeabra over a period of 27 months. Multiplex PCR was used to detect Salmonella Typhi, focusing on the ttr, tviB, and staG genes. An Aquaprobe AP-2000 was also used to measure different physicochemical factors, such as pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and salinity. Three non-spatial models, namely Generalized Estimating Equations (Logistic), Mixed-Effects Models, and Random Forest, as well as four spatial models, including Bayesian Generalized Additive Models (GAM) and Spatial Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM), were fitted to the wastewater dataset. Model fitting was done using 5-fold cross-validation, stratified by site. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. We also used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to find the most important predictors.
Findings:
In general, 44.13% of the samples tested positive for S. Typhi. Detection was much higher during wet seasons (50.17% vs. 35.11%; p < 0.001), with fast flows (64.45%), and in channels that were 1-2 meters wide (58.70%). Positive samples had relatively higher pH (7.46 vs. 7.40; p < 0.001), dissolved oxygen (46.97% vs. 36.77%; p < 0.001), and rainfall (3.92mm vs. 3.30mm; p = 0.022). In comparing both non-spatial and spatial models, the non-spatial Random Forest model demonstrated the highest performance with an accuracy of 0.993, sensitivity of 0.997, and specificity of 0.989. In the SHAP analysis of the preferred non-spatial random forest model, it was found that pH, season, dissolved oxygen, positivity from the previous month, and channel width were identified as the best predictors.
Conclusion:
S. Typhi detection is influenced by wastewater physicochemical properties, with pH, seasonal rainfall, and hydraulic conditions being the most significant. The non-spatial random forest model significantly outperforms both spatial and other non-spatial statistical methods.
