Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Development of a National Indication Protocol for Proton Therapy in Patients With Seminoma Testis to Reduce the Risk
Nienke Kuijsters1, Peter Sinnige2, Pauline A Bakker3
1Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Purpose:
To develop a National Indication Protocol for Proton therapy (PT) (NIPP) for selecting seminoma testis patients (STPs) for PT in the Netherlands, aiming at reducing the risk of subsequent primary cancers (SPCs).
Methods And Materials:
A multidisciplinary workgroup developed criteria for an NIPP based on a systematic literature search. To estimate its potential, PT-photon plan comparisons were constructed for 13 historical patients, after which NIPP version 1 was finalized. First clinical results of NIPP-v1 were evaluated.
Results:
From cohort studies, it was established that the kidney, pancreas, stomach, and bladder were the main organs at risk contributing to excess SPC risks in STPs treated with radiation therapy. Estimated excess relative risks per 1 Gy increase in mean dose were as follows: kidney, 0.13; pancreas, 0.12; stomach, 0.47; and bladder, 0.50. Combined with absolute lifetime risks from the Dutch male population (age, 30-79 years), the corresponding lifetime absolute excess risks (AERs) per 1 Gy increase were +0.20%, +0.16%, +0.28%, and +0.65%, respectively. A first exploratory analysis in 13 replanned historical patients showed potential for an NIPP, as the required AER reduction of ≥2% for a grade 4 adverse event was achievable in 11 cases (85%). In a provisional NIPP version 1, criteria were as follows: age ≤50 years; paraortic and/or para-iliac RT; and no life-threatening comorbidity. In NIPP version 2 (approved and implemented), an estimated lifetime AER reduction of ≥2% by PT was required as well. From the first 76 PT patients based on NIPP-v1, 71% would qualify for NIPP-v2 as well. In 39 available PT-photon comparisons, we found an average 3.0% (median, 2.9%; IQR, 2.1%) AER reduction by PT.
Conclusions:
We defined an NIPP for the selection of STPs for PT in the Netherlands, aimed to reduce the risk of SPC. According to this NIPP, about 75% of these patients qualify for PT. Further studies are required to allow inclusion of nononcological late effects as selection criteria in the NIPP.
