Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Variability in Syndesmotic Screw Angles During Ankle Fracture Fixation: Insights From Postoperative CT Analysis
Tal Shachar1, Oz Cohen1, Omer Marom1
1Orthopedics, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, ISR.
Abstract:
Background Syndesmotic screw fixation is a widely used technique for stabilizing ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption. While current guidelines recommend screw insertion at an angle of 30°-45° relative to the anterior foot, limited evidence supports whether these angles are routinely achieved in clinical settings or are necessary for optimal outcomes. This study aimed to assess the angles actually obtained in practice and to identify radiographic factors associated with successful syndesmotic reduction. Methods This retrospective study evaluated 100 patients treated with syndesmotic screw fixation for ankle fractures at a secondary referral hospital. Postoperative CT scans were used to assess screw angle, tibiofibular distances, and the quality of syndesmotic reduction. All angle measurements were taken in the neutral ankle position using the second metatarsal head as a reference. Associations between screw trajectory and reduction parameters were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0.2.0 (Released 2022; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and WinPEPI software. Results Of the 100 patients, 72% achieved a good syndesmotic reduction. Demographic variables (age, sex), side of injury, injury mechanism, and number of screws showed no significant impact on reduction quality. However, posterior screw placement was significantly associated with poor reduction (p = 0.013). Patients with poor reductions demonstrated significantly higher anterior and posterior tibiofibular distances, greater diastasis, and steeper screw angles (p < 0.001). Conclusions There is a notable discrepancy between the recommended and actual screw angles achieved in practice. Lower angles (~15°) were associated with favorable reductions, challenging the necessity of adhering to the 30°-45° guideline. Further prospective studies are needed to refine surgical recommendations based on clinical outcomes.

