Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Community perspectives on COVID-19 vaccine allocation ethical principles in Uganda: a cross-sectional study
Juliet Kiguli1, Lesley Rose Ninsiima2, Stuart Ssebibubbu1
1Department of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Background:
The scarcity of COVID-19 vaccines raised tough questions about who should get them first. While global guidelines stress fairness, they may overlook local realities and community voices. Without understanding these perspectives, efforts to ensure equity and build trust risk falling short. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the multifaceted perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes of community influencers in Uganda regarding COVID-19 vaccination.
Methods:
This study adopted a mixed-methods cross-sectional descriptive design. The study participants were identified through community-based organizations (CBOs) to get a broad representation of the various community members and practical community entry points. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis with NVivo 12.0 software.
Results:
A total of 100 Ugandan participants took part in the study, less than half of the participants 46.0% knew Uganda/MoH guidelines only. Forty two percent (42%) were neutral on vaccines curbing COVID-19 spread, with uniform effectiveness beliefs (p > 0.05). Ninety percent (90%) supported guiding principles. Only few of the participants 31% agreed that they were very likely to contract COVID-19 after vaccination, 81% favored equal treatment but low trust in equity across classes or tribes. From the qualitative data, five themes which included, gender/power imbalances, economic divides, social norms, herbal alternatives, and tribalism. Global equity skepticism was high (57% no trust in LMIC/HIC quality parity); 86% endorsed national equity, but doubts persisted on at-risk prioritization and fair distribution.
Conclusion:
While awareness of guidelines is relatively high, it is overshadowed by pervasive skepticism regarding vaccine efficacy, profound distrust in the fairness and integrity of distribution processes, and a feeling of exclusion from decision-making at global and national levels. Therefore, addressing these challenges requires a multi-pronged approach that goes beyond simply disseminating information about COVID-19 vaccination. With the strong support for ethical principles in COVID-19 vaccination, addressing equity gaps through culturally attuned strategies is essential for equitable distribution and sustained public trust in Uganda.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethics in Research
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethics and Bioethics
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Cross-reactivity

