Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

07:13
Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
Published on: October 27, 2023
1.7K
Performance of CEUS LI-RADS v2017 major feature combinations: individual patient data meta-analysis
Rawan Awad1, Haresh Naringrekar2, Robert G Adamo1
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Abdominal Radiology (New York)
|February 18, 2026
Summary
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) LI-RADS effectively stratifies hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk, with higher categories showing increased positive predictive values (PPVs). Major feature combinations performed consistently within each category, validating the system's internal consistency for HCC diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Radiology and Imaging
- Hepatology
- Oncology
Background:
- The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) algorithm standardizes hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in at-risk patients.
- The diagnostic performance of specific CEUS LI-RADS major feature combinations requires comprehensive evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS version 2017 major feature combinations for HCC.
- To assess performance across LI-RADS categories 3-5 in at-risk individuals.
Main Methods:
- A living systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis was conducted.
- Included studies used CEUS LI-RADS v2016 or v2017 in at-risk patients, with data updated to February 2024.
- Positive predictive values (PPVs) for HCC were calculated for major feature combinations in LI-RADS categories 3-5 using a random-effects model; risk of bias was assessed.
Main Results:
- Thirteen studies with 1575 patients and 1594 liver observations were included.
- Pooled PPVs for HCC increased with higher CEUS LI-RADS v2017 categories: LR-3 (40.4%), LR-4 (69.7%), and LR-5 (95.1%).
- Major feature combinations showed similar performance within the same category; most studies had moderate to high risk of bias, but sensitivity analysis confirmed findings.
Conclusions:
- CEUS LI-RADS effectively stratifies HCC risk, demonstrating progressively higher PPVs from LR-3 to LR-5.
- Major feature combinations exhibited similar performance within categories, indicating the system's internal consistency.
- Findings align with CT/MRI LI-RADS trends, though CEUS showed wider confidence intervals due to smaller sample sizes.

