Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
Published on: January 18, 2020
Masked and elusive: congruency fails in video-to-photo face matching
Anna Sagana1, Mengying Zhang2, Lara Bekemeier2
1Section Forensic Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. anna.sagana@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
None:
Recognizing masked perpetrators in real-world surveillance scenarios poses significant challenges due to facial occlusion and degraded image quality. This study investigated the effects of contextual congruency on matching surveillance videos to suspects' photos. Participants (N = 229) completed a face-matching task involving four masked or unmasked video targets paired with either full face or masked photos. Matching accuracy was significantly higher for unmasked faces compared to masked faces, with no significant congruency effect between video and photo conditions. Participants' confidence was generally higher in congruent than incongruent conditions, particularly when viewing full-face videos. The confidence-accuracy relationship was condition-dependent, emerging as significant only when masked videos were paired with masked photographs. These findings emphasize the limitations of human performance in identifying masked individuals under degraded conditions and the constraints of potential strategies for improving face recognition in forensic and surveillance contexts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient
Deconvolution
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

