Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Comparative Effectiveness and Risk of Severe Infection in Adult Patients With MS Treated With Diroximel Fumarate
Ahmed Z Obeidat1, Michelle Betz2, Rebecca Straus Farber3
1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Introduction:
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated neurological disease, leading to significant morbidity. Over 25 disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are approved for MS; however, older patients may benefit less from high-efficacy DMTs. We compared the risk of severe infections (SIs) and annualized relapse rate (ARR) by age (< 45 and ≥ 45 years) between diroximel fumarate (DRF) and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in patients with MS.
Methods:
This retrospective study utilized the Komodo Health Claims database to identify patients treated with DRF or anti-CD20 agents. Patients were propensity score matched 1:1 on baseline characteristics and stratified by age (younger: < 45 years; older: ≥ 45 years). Infection-related encounters were identified by diagnosis codes; SIs required hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics. MS relapses were based on inpatient or outpatient claims and associated treatments.
Results:
Between 2016 and 2025, 2894 propensity score-matched patients with MS who initiated DRF (n = 1447) or anti-CD20s (n = 1447) were included. DRF-treated patients had a lower proportion of SIs at 12 and 24 months compared with anti-CD20-treated patients (p ≤ 0.002 at 24 months). Younger DRF-treated patients had significantly fewer SIs (p = 0.005), while older DRF-treated patients had lower non-SI rates. COVID-19-related SIs were also significantly lower in DRF-treated patients (p < 0.001). ARRs were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion:
DRF-treated patients with MS had a significantly lower risk of SI compared with anti-CD20-treated patients, with no difference in ARR. More real-world studies are needed to understand the efficacy and safety of DMTs in the setting of de-escalation in aging patients with MS.
Insights
Diroximel fumarate (DRF) showed a lower risk of severe infections (SIs) compared to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Annualized relapse rates (ARR) were similar between treatments, suggesting DRF may offer a safer profile.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated neurological disease.
- Over 25 disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) exist, but efficacy and safety vary, especially in older populations.
- Comparing diroximel fumarate (DRF) and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for severe infections (SIs) and annualized relapse rate (ARR) in MS patients stratified by age is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the risk of severe infections (SIs) and annualized relapse rate (ARR) between diroximel fumarate (DRF) and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).
- To analyze these outcomes based on patient age (younger: <45 years; older: ≥45 years).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study using the Komodo Health Claims database.
- Propensity score matching (1:1) of patients initiating DRF or anti-CD20 agents.
- Stratification by age (<45 and ≥45 years) and identification of SIs and MS relapses via diagnosis codes and treatment claims.
Main Results:
- 2894 matched patients with MS were included (1447 DRF, 1447 anti-CD20s).
- DRF-treated patients had a significantly lower proportion of SIs at 12 and 24 months (p≤0.002 at 24 months).
- Younger DRF patients had fewer SIs (p=0.005), older DRF patients had lower non-SI rates, and COVID-19-related SIs were lower in DRF patients (p<0.001). ARRs were similar.
Conclusions:
- Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is associated with a significantly lower risk of severe infections (SIs) compared to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in MS patients.
- No significant difference in annualized relapse rates (ARR) was observed between the two treatment groups.
- Further real-world studies are needed to evaluate DMT efficacy and safety, particularly for de-escalation strategies in aging MS populations.
More Related Videos
09:38Determining Immune System Suppression versus CNS Protection for Pharmacological Interventions in Autoimmune Demyelination
Published on: September 12, 2016
10:46A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications