Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Oncogenic Gene Fusion Detection Using Anchored Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Followed by Next Generation Sequencing
Published on: July 5, 2019
RET Fusion-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma: Partner-Specific Clinicopathological Characteristics, Co-Mutation Profiles,
Zihan Sun1, Tianyi Liu2, Jiaxi Xu3
1Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Background:
RET fusions represent actionable oncogenic drivers in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, the clinicopathological features, co-mutation landscape, and therapeutic outcomes across different fusion partners remain incompletely characterized.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 268 patients with RET fusion-positive LUAD diagnosed between July 2017 and December 2024. Clinicopathological features, metastatic patterns, and concomitant genomic alterations were compared between KIF5B and non-KIF5B subgroups. Treatment outcomes of selective RET inhibitors, multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), and immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy were evaluated, with subgroup analyses according to fusion partners.
Results:
The median age at diagnosis was 58 years; most patients were female (57.0%) and never/light smokers (60.8%). Bone (12.3%), pleural (11.9%), and brain metastases (6.7%) were the most common metastatic sites. KIF5B-RET fusions were more frequently detected in earlier disease stages compared with non-KIF5B (p = 0.0531). Among 274 RET fusion events, KIF5B-RET was predominant (65%), followed by CCDC6-RET (16%) and NCOA4-RET (1%). Concomitant mutations were identified in 28.7% of patients, most commonly TP53 (39.0%) and CDKN2A (13.0%), with CDKN2A alterations predominantly consisting of functionally inactivating SNVs concurrent with shallow deletions more enriched in non-KIF5B (p = 0.0393). Nineteen patients received targeted therapy, including pralsetinib, selpercatinib, and cabozantinib, achieving an overall ORR of 57.9% and mPFS of 12.0 months. Notably, non-KIF5B patients demonstrated longer median PFS than KIF5B patients under pralsetinib (17.0 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.0473). Fifteen patients received first-line immunochemotherapy, achieving a median PFS of 17.0 months, ORR of 40.0%, and DCR of 80.0%, comparable to targeted therapy (p = 0.3871).
Conclusions:
RET fusion-positive LUAD comprises biologically heterogeneous subsets defined by fusion partners. KIF5B-RET tend to occur at earlier stages, whereas non-KIF5B are more frequently associated with CDKN2A co-mutations and may derive greater benefit from selective RET inhibition. Immunochemotherapy demonstrates comparable efficacy regardless of fusion partner, highlighting the need for partner-specific therapeutic strategies in RET fusion-positive LUAD.
More Related Videos
11:15Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016
10:35A Blood-based Test for the Detection of ROS1 and RET Fusion Transcripts from Circulating Ribonucleic Acid Using Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: April 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Abnormal Proliferation