Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

07:44
In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
3.5K
Prediction of 9 Artificial Intelligence-based Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Long Caucasian Eyes.
Wiktor Stopyra1, Oleksiy Voytsekhivskyy2, Andrzej Grzybowski3
1From the MW-med Eye Center (W.S.), Krakow, Poland.
American Journal of Ophthalmology
|February 18, 2026
Summary
This study compared nine artificial intelligence (AI) formulas for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in long eyes (axial length > 26 mm). Pearl-DGS, Hill-RBF 3.0, Kane, and Hoffer QST showed the highest accuracy for IOL power prediction.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Technology
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Background:
- Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is crucial for achieving optimal visual outcomes after cataract surgery.
- Eyes with long axial lengths (AL > 26 mm) present unique challenges for traditional IOL power calculation formulas.
- Evaluating advanced AI-based formulas is essential to improve refractive predictability in these challenging eyes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of nine novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas.
- To assess formula performance specifically in eyes with axial lengths greater than 26 mm.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 321 eyes with AL ≥ 26.00 mm who underwent cataract surgery.
- IOL power was calculated using nine AI formulas: 3C 2.0, Hill-RBF 3.0, Hoffer QST, Kane, Karmona, Ladas Super Formula AI (LSF AI), Nallasamy, PEARL-DGS, and Zhu-Lu.
- Accuracy was evaluated using root mean square absolute error (RMSAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentage of eyes with prediction error within ±0.50 D.
Main Results:
- All formulas except Karmona showed statistical superiority over Zhu-Lu and 3C 2.0 for RMSAE.
- Pearl-DGS, Hill-RBF 3.0, and Kane demonstrated statistically better MedAE compared to 3C 2.0 and Zhu-Lu.
- Pearl-DGS (80.06%), Hill-RBF 3.0 (77.57%), and Kane (77.26%) achieved significantly higher accuracy (within ±0.50 D PE) than Zhu-Lu (66.67%) and 3C 2.0 (68.85%).
Conclusions:
- Pearl-DGS, Hill-RBF 3.0, Kane, and Hoffer QST are highly accurate AI-based formulas for IOL power calculation in long eyes (AL > 26 mm).
- These formulas offer improved refractive predictability compared to older methods in this challenging patient cohort.
- The study highlights the potential of advanced AI algorithms in optimizing cataract surgery outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Glaucoma: Overview
1.5K
Glaucoma is an eye condition characterized by increased intraocular pressure that damages the retina and optic nerve, leading to irreversible blindness if left untreated. The human eye has various components, including the cornea, iris, pupil, lens, and optic nerve. Aqueous humor is secreted by the epithelium of the ciliary body in the posterior chamber and flows through the trabecular meshwork and canal of Schlemm, maintaining normal intraocular pressure. The trabecular meshwork and the canal...
1.5K
Focusing of Light in the Eye
6.5K
Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...
6.5K

