Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
Published on: October 25, 2011
Quantitative Assays for TROP2 Measurement in Breast Cancer and Comparison to H-Score
Mengni He1, Nay N N Chan1, Matthew Liu1
1Department of Pathology.
Abstract:
Trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP2) is a popular current antibody-drug conjugate target due to its high expression in various solid tumor types. With the recent FDA-approval of sacituzumab govitecan and datopotamab deruxtecan in breast cancer, TROP2-targeting therapies showed promising clinical outcomes. Despite the prevalent expression of TROP2 in breast cancer (about 90%), the objective response rates from clinical trials are around 30% with nonsignificant hazard ratios for benefit from sacituzumab govitecan in low TROP2-expressing tumors. This suggests that there may be value in a companion diagnostic assay to measure TROP2 protein expression in tumor samples, but H-score assessment is not required. Here, we develop a quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) assay and a quantitative hematoxylin-DAB (QH-DAB) assay for potential use as a future companion diagnostic test. TROP2 peptide concentrations were measured in cell lines using mass spectrometry to convert fluorescent signal or chromogen optical density to protein concentrations in amol/mm 2 . Coupled with QuPath-based image analysis tool Qymia, our QIF and QH-DAB assays have limits of detection of 90 amol/mm 2 and 667 amol/mm 2 , and limits of quantifications of 272 amol/mm 2 and 2021 amol/mm 2 , respectively. Using these assays, we measured the TROP2 expression in a breast cancer serial cohort (N=264) and a triple-negative breast cancer cohort (N=100) from Yale New Haven Hospital, identifying a broad dynamic range of TROP2 expression in breast cancer samples. Since the H-score method is the current standard of practice in the clinics, we selected 68 breast cancer biopsies and compared the measurements from our assays to H-scores evaluated by 5 certified pathologists. There is an overall agreement between our QIF and QH-DAB measurements and pathologists' readings. However, the quantitative assay has better sensitivity and less subjectivity. In summary, these assays allow for an accurate and reproducible TROP2 protein measurement that could be incorporated into a clinical workflow. This work represents only analytic validation, but work on clinical validation has begun. In the future, this assay may help identify patients who are more likely to benefit from TROP2-targeted therapies.
Insights
New quantitative assays accurately measure Trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP2) protein expression in breast cancer. These assays offer improved sensitivity and reproducibility for TROP2-targeted therapies, aiding patient selection.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Biomarker Development
- Translational Research
Background:
- Trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP2) is a key target for antibody-drug conjugates in various solid tumors, including breast cancer.
- Recent FDA approvals highlight the clinical success of TROP2-targeting therapies, yet response rates vary, suggesting a need for precise TROP2 expression measurement.
- Current H-score assessments lack the sensitivity and objectivity required for optimal patient stratification in TROP2-targeted therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and analytically validate quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) and quantitative hematoxylin-DAB (QH-DAB) assays for measuring TROP2 protein expression.
- To establish TROP2 peptide concentration equivalents for QIF and QH-DAB assay readouts using mass spectrometry.
- To evaluate the performance of the developed assays in breast cancer patient cohorts and compare them with the standard H-score method.
Main Methods:
- Development of QIF and QH-DAB assays for TROP2 protein quantification.
- Mass spectrometry-based calibration to convert assay signals to TROP2 peptide concentrations (amol/mm²).
- Utilized QuPath-based image analysis (Qymia) for automated quantification and assessment in breast cancer patient samples (N=264 + N=100).
- Comparative analysis of QIF and QH-DAB assay results against H-scores from 5 certified pathologists on 68 breast cancer biopsies.
Main Results:
- The QIF and QH-DAB assays demonstrated robust performance with defined limits of detection and quantification.
- Mass spectrometry enabled accurate conversion of assay signals to TROP2 protein concentrations.
- Broad dynamic range of TROP2 expression was observed across breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer patient cohorts.
- Quantitative assays showed overall agreement with pathologist-evaluated H-scores but offered superior sensitivity and reduced subjectivity.
Conclusions:
- Developed QIF and QH-DAB assays provide accurate and reproducible TROP2 protein quantification.
- These assays have the potential to serve as companion diagnostics for TROP2-targeted therapies.
- The quantitative approach may improve patient selection for therapies targeting TROP2, enhancing treatment efficacy.

