Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

A Familial Hypercholesterolemia Human Liver Chimeric Mouse Model Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Hepatocytes
Published on: September 15, 2018
Positive Predictive Values of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry and the
Jakob Knold1,2, Christian Bork3,4, Martin Snoer5
1Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Introduction:
The Danish Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) Registry (DFH) was established in 2020 to monitor the detection rate of FH and quality of care provided among patients with FH. DFH is nationwide, and together with the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) includes more than 10,000 registered cases of FH. However, the validity of FH diagnoses in the DNPR and DFH is unknown.
Purpose:
We aimed to investigate the positive predictive value of FH cases registered in the DNPR and DFH.
Methods:
We retrospectively retrieved a nationwide random sample of 800 patients with an FH diagnosis registered in the DNPR between 1st of January 2020 and 1st of May 2023. Subsequently, we retrieved information on cases also registered in the DFH, and validated all registered cases based on medical records. Individuals with a Dutch Lipid Clinical Network-score ≥ 6 were considered valid FH cases. Positive predictive values with 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the validity of the registered diagnoses.
Results:
We found a positive predictive value of 63.8% (95% CI: 60.7; 67.0) for an FH diagnosis recorded in the DNPR (510/800), and 88.1% (95% CI: 82.2; 92.3%) for those diagnosed with genetic FH (141/160). A primary diagnosis of FH registered by cardiological departments had a positive predictive value of 71.0% (95% CI: 67.2; 74.6%) (417/587), and 88.3% (95% CI: 82.6; 92.8%) for genetic FH (113/128), respectively. The positive predictive value of FH cases registered in the DFH was 83.0% (95% CI: 78.9; 86.5) (318/383).
Conclusion:
The validity of FH cases in the DFH was high, while the validity of an FH diagnosis in the DNPR was relatively low. However, restricting the analysis to a primary diagnosis obtained from cardiological departments may be used to improve the validity of FH diagnoses in the DNPR.
More Related Videos
05:58Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Genetic Variation in a Sporadic Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patient Using the Chip-in-a-tube Format
Published on: August 20, 2018
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT