Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

An Instrumented Pull Test to Characterize Postural Responses
Published on: April 6, 2019
Monitoring Resistance Training Intensity Using Load-Intercept from The Load-Velocity Relationship Variables: The Case
Zhaoqian Li1, Qingzhou Chang2, Zongwei Chen3
1School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Abstract:
This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using deadlift load-velocity (L-V) relationship variables, specifically the load-intercept (L0 ), to monitor resistance training intensity. Fifteen well-trained male and fifteen well-trained female athletes completed two incremental load tests, recording movement mean velocity (MV) until reaching one repetition maximum (1RM) in two sessions. Although L0 (CV = 4.98%, ICC = 0.974) demonstrated lower between-session reliability than 1RM (CV = 3.48%, ICC = 0.989), its reliability was still at an acceptable level. Furthermore, the 1RM/L0 ratio showed acceptable between-subjects variability (CV = 6.39%). Consequently, L0 could serve as an alternative reference for prescribing training intensity in place of the 1RM. Both the %1RM-MV and %L0 -MV relationships were found to be valid for monitoring training intensity in the high-intensity range (absolute error ≤ 4.05%, at around 80% and 90%1RM) but not in the low-intensity range (absolute error ≥ 6.31%, from 40% to 70%1RM). Although not a complete replacement for the 1RM, the %L0 - MV relationship still offers a practical and convenient method for monitoring deadlift training in high-intensity range (above 80%1RM), particularly in settings where frequent assessments are required.
More Related Videos
07:30Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018
07:44Construction of Constant-Load (Isotonic) and Constant-Velocity (Isokinetic) Torque-Velocity-Power Profiles In vivo for the Rat Plantar Flexors
Published on: October 3, 2025