Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs
Published on: February 18, 2022
Novel biomarkers distinguish heart failure with preserved vs reduced ejection fraction
Camilla Hage1,2, Annika Mang3, Jean Claude Daubert4
1Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Introduction:
Heart failure (HF) with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction may be driven by different pathophysiologies. We explored novel biomarkers, associations with clinical characteristics, discrimination between LVEF categories and associations with outcomes.
Methods And Results:
In HFpEF(n = 76) and HFrEF(n = 36), 19 plasma biomarkers were measured including seven novel research assays for ANGPT2, BMP10, DKK3, FABP3, FGF23, IGFBP7, and MYBPC3. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients were older (73 vs 63 years), more often female (50% vs 14%). All seven novel biomarkers except FABP3 tended to be higher in HFrEF vs HFpEF and associated with worse NYHA class and lower eGFR in both LVEF categories. MYBPC3 and FGF23 (higher in HFrEF) discriminated best between LVEF categories (AUC 85.8 and 80.0 respectively). In HFpEF, higher ANGPT2 was associated with worse right (TAPSE: β = -1.03;P = .04) and left ventricular function (LV-GLS; β = 1.29;P = .03) and left atrial strain (LA-GLS: β = 5.03;P < .001) whereas higher IGFBP7 and MYBPC3 with diastolic dysfunction (E/e': β = 4.09;P = .02 and β = 1.36;P = .01 respectively). All biomarkers except DKK3 were positively associated with the outcome (HFpEF:all-cause death, HF hospitalization;HFrEF: all-cause death, LVAD or heart transplantation). Specifically ANGPT2 [HR 1.45(95% CI 1.00-2.13)] more strongly in HFpEF and IGFBP7 [2.51(0.95-6.64)] more strongly in HFrEFand MYBPC3 [1.62(0.99-2.64)].
Conclusion:
Among seven novel biomarker assays, higher MYBPC3 (reflecting muscle injury and myopathy) and FGF23 (endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress) distinguished HFrEF from HFpEF. Higher MYBPC3 was most prognostic in HFrEF while higher ANGPT2 and IGFBP7 (endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress) in HFpEF. These hypothesis-generating findings support primary cardiomyocyte injury as a driver of HFrEF and systemic inflammation and oxidative stress as a driver of HFpEF.
Clinical Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00774709.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

