Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
Published on: May 31, 2018
Ideal Versus Real Group Mental Representations During Communicative Exchange: A Hyperscanning Study
Carlotta Acconito1,2, Roberta A Allegretta1,2, Laura Angioletti1,2
1International research center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Group decision-making involves cognitive and emotional processes. This study used multimodal hyperscanning to show how representing ideal versus real groups impacts neural and autonomic responses during communication.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Group decision-making is complex, involving cognitive and emotional elements.
- Mental representations of a group (ideal vs. real) influence communication dynamics.
- Understanding neural and autonomic correlates of group communication is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how self-representing ideal versus real group dimensions affects decision-making.
- To examine the impact of these representations on neural and autonomic responses during dyadic communication.
- To explore the utility of a multimodal hyperscanning approach in studying group interactions.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a multimodal hyperscanning paradigm combining electroencephalography (EEG), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), and biofeedback (BIO).
- Recorded EEG bands, oxygenated/deoxygenated hemoglobin, and heart rate variability (HRV) in 28 participants forming dyads.
- Participants discussed group decisions while self-representing either an ideal or a real group.
Main Results:
- Increased frontal low-frequency EEG bands indicated emotional involvement in communication.
- Self-representing the real group correlated with higher beta/gamma bands and deoxygenated hemoglobin, suggesting greater cognitive effort.
- Ideal group representation was linked to increased HRV, indicating better emotion regulation.
- Dyadic analyses revealed increased delta dissimilarity (emotional/cognitive engagement) and beta dissimilarity (attentional/cognitive control) under real group representation.
Conclusions:
- Multimodal hyperscanning provides valuable, complementary insights into communicative exchanges.
- Findings deepen the understanding of group decision-making processes and the role of mental representations.
- Results support the development of strategies to enhance group communication effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
Deindividuation
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication

