Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Characterization and Application of Passive Samplers for Monitoring of Pesticides in Water
Published on: August 3, 2016
Comprehensive per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) screening in Dutch surface waters using target, suspect, and
D Jérémy Liwara1, Carsten Baessmann2, Birgit Schneider2
1Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
None:
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) form a large chemical group, but routine monitoring targets only a few well-known compounds such as perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). To better understand the widespread occurrence of PFAS in Dutch surface waters, we performed target analysis using an expanded list of compounds, combined with extensive suspect and de novo non-target screening (SNTS) to explore unreported PFAS beyond the scope of conventional monitoring. Analyses were performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography-trapped ion-mobility time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-timsTOF-MS). Target analysis focused on 24 previously underreported sulfonamide-based PFASs, enabled by newly available analytical standards and 34 common PFASs, representing 58 compounds. Several N-alkyl perfluoroalkane sulfonamidoacetic acids, including MeFBSAA (up to 50 ng/L), were found. SPr-FHxSA (N-sulfo propyl perfluorohexane sulfonamide), associated with aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs), was detected in five samples (0.14-1.99 ng/L). In total, 38 PFAS were identified by target analysis. Collision cross-section (CCS) values of analytical standards were measured prior to SNTS. In SNTS, nineteen compounds, mainly fluorinated pharmaceuticals and pesticides, were identified at confidence level 2a using the MassBank library. Another 22 candidates were tentatively classified at levels 2b or 3, including an unsaturated PFOS analogue and a fluazinam transformation product, highlighting the ability of de novo SNTS to uncover unexpected PFAS. Finally, 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonyl propanoamido-dimethylethyl sulfonate (6:2 FtSO2AoS) was confirmed at level 1a. Overall, integrating new PFAS standards with SNTS provided a far more complete view of PFAS presence in Dutch waters than target monitoring.
More Related Videos
09:04Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
Published on: April 18, 2019
07:06Investigating Long-Distance Transport of Perfluoroalkyl Acids in Wheat via a Split-Root Exposure Technique
Published on: September 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Testing Water Quality
Non-destructive Tests for Concrete Strength