Retrograde Access Bailout Versus Bypass Surgery for Failed Antegrade Infrainguinal Angioplasty

M Elkassaby1, M Mabrouk2, Y M Alkhateeb3

  • 1Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Annals of Vascular Surgery
|February 19, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Retrograde angioplasty is a successful bailout for failed antegrade procedures in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients. This approach offers comparable limb salvage to bypass surgery but with fewer amputations and lower mortality.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Endovascular Interventions

Background:

  • Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) present significant clinical and economic challenges.
  • Antegrade angioplasty is a primary treatment for infra-inguinal disease, but failure necessitates alternative strategies.
  • Evaluating bailout options after failed antegrade angioplasty is crucial for limb salvage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of retrograde angioplasty as a bailout strategy versus bypass surgery and conservative management.
  • To assess limb salvage rates, amputation rates, and survival outcomes in patients with failed antegrade angioplasty for CLTI.
  • To determine the safety and effectiveness of retrograde access in complex infra-inguinal occlusive disease.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective multi-center study of 1052 infra-inguinal angioplasty procedures (Jan 2021-Jan 2023).
  • Included patients with CLTI (Rutherford classes 4-6) and failed antegrade angioplasty.
  • Compared outcomes for retrograde angioplasty (n=38), bypass surgery (n=58), and conservative management (n=33).

Main Results:

  • Retrograde angioplasty achieved a 90% success rate, comparable to bypass surgery (91%).
  • Major amputation rates were significantly lower with retrograde angioplasty (39.5%) compared to bypass (50%) and conservative management (87.8%, p=0.027).
  • Amputation-free survival was significantly higher, and mortality was lowest in the retrograde group over 3-year follow-up (p=0.001).

Conclusions:

  • Retrograde angioplasty is a safe and effective alternative to bypass surgery after failed antegrade procedures in CLTI.
  • It demonstrates comparable limb salvage and reduced perioperative risks.
  • Conservative management showed limited efficacy with higher amputation and mortality rates.
Abstract