Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Recombination Dynamics in Thin-film Photovoltaic Materials via Time-resolved Microwave Conductivity
Published on: March 6, 2017
Disentangling Structural and Electronic Contributions to Photogenerated Mobile Charge Carrier Yield and Transport in
Sa'ar Shor Peled1,2, Kumaraswamy Miriyala1,2, Daniel A Grave1,2
1Department of Materials Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 8410500, Israel.
Abstract:
Iron oxides exhibit poor photoconversion efficiencies as photoelectrodes for solar water splitting, generally attributed to short carrier diffusion lengths and subunity yields of photogenerated mobile charge carriers caused by ultrafast relaxation through ligand field (LF) states. However, the extent to which crystal structure or electronic configuration governs these loss mechanisms remains unclear. Here, epitaxial thin-film photoanodes of the α- and β-Fe2O3 polymorphs, which share the same Fe3+ (3d5) electronic configuration yet possess distinct crystal symmetries, are employed as model systems to disentangle the relative influence of electronic configuration and crystal structure on charge carrier yields and transport. Using a computational method that combines optical and photoelectrochemical measurements, we determine both the wavelength-dependent efficiency of mobile charge carrier generation and the depth-dependent charge collection probability. We find that structural factors influence charge carrier transport, with the α-Fe2O3 films exhibiting a larger hole transport length than the β-Fe2O3 thin films. In contrast, both polymorphs show an essentially identical spectral profile for mobile-carrier generation, indicating that the energies of the ligand-to-metal charge-transfer (LMCT) transitions that produce mobile carriers are largely unaffected by the difference in crystal structure. These results suggest that carrier yields are governed predominantly by the local Fe-O electronic structure associated with the octahedrally coordinated Fe3+ centers and are consistent with the view that ligand-field states act as intrinsic nonproductive relaxation pathways in open d-shell metal oxides.
More Related Videos
11:38Influence of Hybrid Perovskite Fabrication Methods on Film Formation, Electronic Structure, and Solar Cell Performance
Published on: February 27, 2017
06:53Author Spotlight: Magnetometric Characterization of Intermediates in the Solid-State Electrochemistry of Redox-Active Metal-Organic Frameworks
Published on: June 9, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Fermi Level
At absolute zero temperature, electrons fill all energy states up to the Fermi level, leaving upper states empty. As the temperature rises,...
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Valence Bond Theory
Fermi Level Dynamics
Electron affinity in semiconductors refers to the energy gap between the minimum of its conduction band and the vacuum level and it is a critical parameter in determining how easily a semiconductor can accept additional electrons.
The work...
Carrier Generation and Recombination
This process is given by the generation rate G and is efficient due to the conservation of momentum between the valence band maximum and conduction band minimum.
Indirect generation involves an...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...