Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Specialty representation and interdisciplinary collaboration in hand surgery research over four decades.

The Journal of hand surgery, European volume·2026
Same author

Disparities in Burns Research Authorship in Burn-Specific Journals: Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association·2026
Same author

Management of postpartum rectus diastasis in primary care.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

Management and outcomes of acute hand and wrist infections in low- and middle-income countries : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

Metabolic and bariatric surgery for patients with obesity type 1 diabetes mellitus: A comprehensive updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2026
Same author

Nasal Aesthetic Preferences Across Populations: A Systematic Review of Cultural, Ethnic, and Generational Trends.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

17.3K

CONSORT Compliance of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.

Sebastian Mitchell1, Yousif F Yousif2, Ming Zien3

  • 1Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK. sebastian.mitchell@hotmail.co.uk.

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
|February 19, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This review found moderate adherence to CONSORT reporting guidelines in rhinoplasty randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Key areas like trial registration and funding disclosure need improvement to enhance research quality and patient safety.

Keywords:
Aesthetic surgeryConsolidated standards of reporting trialsRandomized control trialsRhinoplasty

More Related Videos

Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table
04:57

Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table

Published on: July 3, 2025

1.1K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

17.3K
Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table
04:57

Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table

Published on: July 3, 2025

1.1K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for surgical intervention evaluation.
  • Consistent adherence to CONSORT reporting guidelines is lacking in rhinoplasty RCTs.
  • Transparent reporting is vital in rhinoplasty due to individualized outcomes and varied techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and assess adherence to CONSORT-NPT guidelines in rhinoplasty RCTs.
  • To identify specific reporting deficiencies in published rhinoplasty RCTs.
  • To evaluate the quality of evidence and identify factors influencing reporting adherence.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review adhering to PRISMA and AMSTAR-2 guidelines.
  • Searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE for rhinoplasty RCTs (2017-2024).
  • Evaluated CONSORT-NPT checklist adherence, study quality (Cochrane Risk of Bias, GRADE), and analyzed correlations with journal impact factor and author count.

Main Results:

  • Ninety-seven rhinoplasty RCTs were analyzed, showing a mean CONSORT adherence of 68.8%.
  • High reporting for objectives and abstracts, but deficits in trial registration (53.6%) and funding disclosures (51.5%).
  • Most studies were single-center with limited participants, impacting generalizability; no correlation found between adherence and journal impact factor or author count.

Conclusions:

  • Rhinoplasty RCTs demonstrate moderate CONSORT adherence, with significant gaps in essential reporting areas.
  • Prioritizing CONSORT guideline enforcement is key to improving research quality and patient safety.
  • Addressing reporting deficits will enhance reproducibility and evidence-based practice in rhinoplasty.