Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Beta-Blockers After Myocardial Infarction Without Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis of Kaplan-Meier
Ameer Awashra1, Ahmed Emara2, Ahmed Mazen Amin3
1Department of Medicine, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Background:
The long-term benefit of beta-blockers (β-blockers) after myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 40%) remains uncertain in the modern reperfusion era. Earlier trials showed mortality benefits, but contemporary therapies may have altered their effect.
Methods:
We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing β-blockers versus no β-blockers in adults with MI and LVEF ≥ 40%. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through October 2025. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, and heart failure (HF). Individual patient data (IPD) were reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves for time-to-event analysis, and pooled risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using random-effects models. Trial sequential analysis (TSA), meta-regression, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) certainty assessments were performed.
Results:
Five RCTs (n = 23,524 patients) met inclusion criteria. β-Blockers did not significantly reduce recurrent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (HR: 0.89 with 95% confidence interval [CI 0.78, 1.02], P = 0.1), HF (HR: 0.92 with 95% CI [0.71, 1.20], P = 0.54), and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.97 with 95% CI [0.85, 1.10], P = 0.63). Secondary endpoints-including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular death, stroke, and revascularization-were neutral (P > 0.05). TSA boundaries were not crossed, and meta-regression identified no significant effect modifiers. Evidence certainty was rated low to moderate.
Conclusions:
Among patients with MI and preserved LVEF, β-blockers did not reduce mortality or ischemic or HF events. Routine long-term use offers no prognostic advantage and should be reserved for specific indications such as reduced LVEF, angina, arrhythmia, or hypertension.
Registration:
International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) identifier no. CRD420251175415.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of β-Receptor Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of β-Receptor Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers

