Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Repeatability and reproducibility of a new classification for measuring primary stability of dental implants based on
José Rosas-Díaz1,2, Nancy Córdova-Limaylla1, Maria Eugenia Guerrero3
1School of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru.
Background:
Assessing primary stability is critical to predicting dental implant success, yet existing assessments often rely on subjective judgment. This study presents and validates a classification system based on the progressive insertion torque value (PITV) to provide objective, reproducible parameters for guiding prosthetic loading protocols.
Material And Methods:
An analytical observational study was conducted on 1,250 implant torque-curve interpretations. Primary stability was classified into three types according to final insertion torque (IT): high (50 Ncm), moderate (30 to <50 Ncm), and low (<30 Ncm). Types I and II included four PITV subtypes (A-D), while Type III included six subtypes (A-F) based on curve trajectory patterns. Twenty-five dentists were trained in curve interpretation, and intra- and inter-examiner agreement was assessed using Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa statistics and prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). Predictive validity was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (area under the curve [AUC] with 95% confidence intervals). Calibration (intercept and slope) and the Brier score were also computed.
Results:
Intraexaminer agreement was almost perfect in both general dentists and implant specialists (k = 0.82-0.95). Interexaminer agreement was also almost perfect (general dentists: k = 0.81; specialists: k = 0.89). Overall agreement was k = 0.84 (p < 0.001). The classification showed moderate predictive discrimination (AUC = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.81).
Conclusions:
The classification of primary stability based on the progressive insertion torque value in edentulous maxillary ridges showed high intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability in interpreting torque-time curves. Its clinical utility, predictive performance, and prosthetic loading thresholds were not assessed in this study and warrant prospective evaluation.

