Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Anatomical Variations of the Mandibular Buccal Shelf According to Sex, Facial Biotype, and Root Reference: A CBCT
Estefania Patricia Flores-Villamarín1, Mauricio Aguirre-Balseca2, Marjory Elizabeth Vaca-Zapata3
1D.D.S. Student. Department of Orthodontics, University of the Hemispheres, Quito, Ecuador. ORCID: 0009-0003-6598-2586.
Background:
To evaluate, through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), the anatomical characteristics of the mandibular buccal shelf according to sex, facial biotype, hemiarch, and reference root, in order to determine bone availability for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
Material And Methods:
A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 60 CBCT scans (480 roots) of patients aged 12-53 years. Measurements of angulation, horizontal bone thickness (4 mm and 6 mm), and vertical bone height (6 mm and 11 mm) were obtained at the mesial and distal roots of the mandibular first and second molars. Statistical analyses included t-test and one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05).
Results:
The distal root of the mandibular second molar exhibited the highest bone dimensions (angulation 37°, horizontal thickness 17.3 mm at 4 mm and 10.0 mm at 6 mm, vertical height 5.4 mm at 6 mm and 6.7 mm at 11 mm), establishing it as the most favorable insertion site. In contrast, the mesial root of the first molar showed the lowest values. Sex-related analysis revealed slightly greater dimensions in males, with significant differences in horizontal thickness at 4 mm and vertical height at 11 mm (p = 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed among facial biotypes or between hemiarches, although brachyfacial patients consistently showed the highest averages.
Conclusions:
The distal root of the mandibular second molar represents the most reliable anatomical site for mini-implant placement in the buccal shelf, regardless of sex or facial growth pattern. CBCT assessment remains essential for individualized planning and to minimize complications.
More Related Videos
10:23Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025