Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
The Human Factor: Physicians' Unbiased Interpretation of Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department
Yuval Avidan1, Razi Khoury1, Hani Sliman2
1Department of Cardiology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Insights
Atrial fibrillation (AF) misdiagnosis in emergency departments is common, affecting 2.7% of cases and leading to inappropriate treatments. This rate is similar whether or not computerized ECG interpretations are used.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Misinterpreting atrial fibrillation (AF) carries significant clinical risks.
- Limited real-world data exists on emergency department (ED) clinicians' diagnostic accuracy for AF without computerized ECG interpretation (CIE).
- This study assesses AF misdiagnosis frequency and impact in an ED environment lacking CIE.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of atrial fibrillation misdiagnosis in an ED setting.
- To evaluate the clinical consequences of misdiagnosed atrial fibrillation.
- To compare diagnostic accuracy with and without computerized ECG interpretation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 1797 ECGs initially diagnosed with AF over five years.
- Two cardiologists reevaluated ECGs, with an electrophysiologist as arbitrator.
- Clinical follow-up was conducted for misdiagnosed cases.
Main Results:
- A misdiagnosis rate of 2.7% (49 cases) was identified among the reviewed ECGs.
- Common misclassifications included supraventricular tachycardia and sinus rhythm variants.
- Patients with incorrect AF diagnoses were older and received inappropriate therapies like anticoagulants and rate-control agents.
Conclusions:
- Atrial fibrillation misdiagnosis is prevalent in EDs, leading to unnecessary pharmacotherapy.
- The rate of AF misdiagnosis appears comparable between CIE-assisted and physician-only interpretations.
- Improved diagnostic strategies are needed to reduce misclassification and inappropriate treatment.
Background:
Misinterpretation of atrial fibrillation (AF) poses significant clinical risks. While the impact of computerized ECG interpretations (CIE) on clinical decision-making is well-documented, there is limited real-world evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of emergency department (ED) clinicians in the absence of such tools. This study examines the frequency and clinical impact of AF misdiagnosis in an ED operating without CIE.
Methods:
ECGs of consecutive patients discharged with a diagnosis of AF over a five-year period were reevaluated by two cardiologists, with an electrophysiologist serving as an arbitrator. Misdiagnosed cases underwent further clinical follow-up.
Results:
Of 1828 ECGs initially identified as AF, 31 were excluded due to paced rhythms or indeterminate tracings, yielding a final cohort of 1797. Among these, 49 cases (2.7%) were misclassified, encompassing supraventricular tachycardia (n = 30), sinus rhythm with premature atrial contractions, Mobitz type I block, or artifact (n = 18), and multifocal atrial tachycardia (n = 1). Patients with erroneous AF diagnoses were older (mean age 76.7 vs. 72.5 years, p = 0.032) and frequently received inappropriate therapies, including rate-control agents (n = 12), antiarrhythmics (n = 8), and anticoagulants (n = 24).
Conclusions:
AF misdiagnosis remains prevalent in the ED and can lead to unnecessary pharmacotherapy. The misdiagnosis rate appears comparable between CIE-assisted and physician-only interpretations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias

