Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
Published on: January 26, 2024
On the Coexistence of Captions and Sign Language as Accessibility Solutions in Educational Settings
Francesco Pavani1,2, Valerio Leonetti3,4
1Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, Italy.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: In mainstream educational settings, deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) students may have limited or no access to the spoken lectures and discussions that are central to the hearing majority classroom. Yet, engagement in these educational and social exchanges is fundamental to their learning and inclusion. Two primary visual accessibility solutions can support this need: real-time speech-to-text transcriptions (i.e., captioning) and high-quality sign language interpreting. Their combined use (or coexistence), however, raises concerns of competition between concurrent streams of visual information. This article examines the empirical evidence concerning the effectiveness of using both captioning and sign language simultaneously in educational settings. Specifically, it investigates whether this combined approach leads to better or worse content learning for DHH students, when compared to using either visual accessibility solution in isolation. Methods: A review of all English language studies in peer-reviewed journals until August 2025 was performed. Eligible studies used an experimental design to compare content learning when using sign language and captions together, versus using sign language or captions on their own. Databases Reviewed: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, and PsycInfo. Results: A total of four studies met the criteria for inclusion. This limited evidence is insufficient to decide on the coexistence of captioning and sign language. Yet, it underscores the potential of captions for content access in education for DHH, even when sign language is available. Conclusions: The present article reveals the lack of evidence in favor or against its coexistence with sign language. With the aim to be constructive for future research, the discussion offers considerations on the attentional demands of simultaneous visual accessibility resources, the diversity of DHH learners, and the impact of current and forthcoming technological advancements.
More Related Videos
11:39Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
Published on: September 7, 2022
09:16Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Sign Convention
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Contact-dependent Signaling
Gap Junctions
In animal cells, gap junctions are formed...
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...
Channels of Non-Verbal Communication