Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
Published on: April 14, 2023
Large language models with image processing in automated Cobb angle.
Jonathan Gibson1, Sanika Kharwadkar2, Chuck Lam1
1College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Current large language models (LLMs) demonstrate limited accuracy in measuring Cobb angles for scoliosis assessment. AI tools require further development before clinical integration for spinal deformity analysis.
Area of Science:
- Medical imaging analysis
- Artificial intelligence in healthcare
- Spinal deformity assessment
Background:
- Scoliosis severity is quantified by the Cobb angle measured on radiographs.
- The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical workflows raises questions about its utility in spinal deformity classification.
- Evaluating the capabilities of leading large language models (LLMs) in clinical applications is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy of four prominent LLMs (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok) in calculating Cobb angles from scoliosis radiographs.
- To compare the performance of these LLMs against a radiologist's measurements.
- To evaluate the usability and clinical applicability of AI in Cobb angle determination.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 122 scoliosis patient radiographs.
- Independent Cobb angle calculation by a fellowship-trained radiologist using Horos software as the reference standard.
- Radiographs were analyzed by four LLMs to identify scoliosis type, generate overlays, and calculate Cobb angles, with subsequent statistical analysis.
Main Results:
- Gemini and ChatGPT showed significant limitations, with Gemini failing to produce measurements and ChatGPT exhibiting large errors (MAE 58.6° ± 45.9°).
- Perplexity and Grok provided estimates for all cases, but with mean differences of 18.8° (±13.3°) and 24.2° (±18.3°), respectively.
- No AI model accurately identified S-shaped scoliosis or met the clinically acceptable difference (≤10%) for Cobb angle measurement.
Conclusions:
- Commercially available LLMs currently exhibit insufficient accuracy for clinical Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis.
- While Perplexity and Grok showed better performance among the tested models, none achieved clinically acceptable accuracy.
- Development of specialized AI tools is necessary for reliable clinical integration in spinal deformity assessment.
More Related Videos
07:46Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
Published on: August 9, 2024
05:47Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Language and Cognition
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior