Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Increasing the Concentration of Dialysate Magnesium on Cardiovascular Health: A Narrative Review.

Canadian journal of kidney health and disease·2026
Same author

Effect of prebiotic intervention on glycemic control and gut microbiome profile in Indian children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM): a pilot randomised control trial.

Endocrine·2026
Same author

Identification of Maintenance Dialysis Recipients From an Electronic Clinical Information System and Effects on Estimates of Incidence and Prevalence.

Kidney medicine·2026
Same author

A Shielded Circuit: Pulsed-Field Ablation of VT Substrate Hidden Behind a Calcified Thrombus.

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology·2026
Same author

Influence of the Gut Microbiome on Body Composition and Metabolic Risk in Indian Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1dm).

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences·2026
Same author

Screen Time and its Impact on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors among Children and Youth with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D).

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences·2026
Same journal

The Rise of Nerve Transfers: Tracing a National Evolution Toward the Postgrafting Era in Brachial Plexus Injury Management.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Response to: The Cost of Matching into Plastic Surgery.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Review of Pressure Sores: Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Surgical Management.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Venous Flow-Through Flaps in Hand Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Experimental Rat Peripheral Nerve Models: Surgical Exposures and Applications.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

The Cost of Matching into Plastic Surgery.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

774

Predicting Surgical Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction With Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.

Ashton Rosenbloom, Thomas Gasbeck, Lana Mamoun

  • 1From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA.

Annals of Plastic Surgery
|February 20, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning (ML) models show promise in predicting outcomes for breast reconstruction surgery. Models predicting patient satisfaction (BREAST-Q) and those using class imbalance techniques demonstrated higher accuracy, aiding surgical planning.

Keywords:
artificial intelligencebreast reconstructionmachine learningpredictive modelingrisk stratification

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

774
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly used in plastic surgery to predict patient outcomes and guide decision-making.
  • This review focuses on the performance of ML models specifically within breast reconstruction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) prediction models in breast reconstruction.
  • To compare the effectiveness of different ML models and outcome measures in predicting surgical results.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE was performed.
  • Included studies used ML to predict outcomes in breast reconstruction, reporting model types and performance metrics (e.g., area under the receiver operating characteristic curve).
  • Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, multivariate linear regression, and meta-regression.

Main Results:

  • Fourteen studies involving 19 ML models and 11,013 patients were analyzed.
  • The median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve across all models was 0.71.
  • Models predicting BREAST-Q outcomes and those using class imbalance mitigation showed significantly higher discrimination.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning models are effective for predicting various outcomes in breast reconstruction, including surgical complications and patient satisfaction.
  • Models predicting BREAST-Q and employing class imbalance methods demonstrated superior discrimination.
  • Standardized reporting is crucial for future ML applications in plastic surgery to ensure reproducibility and facilitate comparisons.