Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
Non-contrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography in myocardial bridge assessment: a CCTA-referenced diagnostic
Feng Wang1,2, Shaobin Zhuang1,2, Xi Liu3
1Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Abstract:
BackgroundMyocardial bridge (MB) may lead to myocardial ischemia. Non-contrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) offers a non-invasive, radiation-free alternative to computed tomography coronary angiography (CCTA); however, the performance of whole-heart versus volume-targeted CMRA for MB detection remains unclear.PurposeTo evaluate and compare the diagnostic efficacy of non-contrast whole-heart and volume-targeted CMRA using balanced SSFP sequences in MB detection.Material and MethodsThis prospective study enrolled 30 consecutive patients with suspected or confirmed MB. All patients underwent both whole-heart and volume-targeted CMRA. Image quality was scored on a 3-point scale. MB detection confidence was rated on a 5-point scale. Using CCTA as the reference standard, diagnostic performance was evaluated by biserial rank correlation (rb) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with calculation of areas under the curve (AUCs). MB thickness and tunneled coronary segment length were additionally measured and compared between CMRA and CCTA.ResultsBoth CMRA techniques achieved a 97.04% diagnostic rate across coronary segments. Image quality scores (whole-heart=2.27-2.87; volume-targeted=2.37-2.93) showed no significant differences. At the patient level, strong correlations with CCTA were observed for whole-heart (rb = 0.66), volume-targeted (rb = 0.70), and combined CMRA (rb = 0.72) (all P <0.001). At the segment level, correlations remained strong for whole-heart (rb = 0.82), volume-targeted (rb = 0.70), and combined CMRA (rb = 0.82) (all P <0.001). ROC analysis showed comparable diagnostic performance among the three approaches at both LAD level (AUC=0.86, 0.89, 0.91; all P >0.05) and segment level (AUC=0.97, 0.89, 0.95; all P >0.05). No significant differences were observed between CMRA and CCTA in MB thickness or tunneled segment length for either whole-heart or volume-targeted CMRA (all P >0.05).ConclusionWhole-heart and volume-targeted CMRA provide high-quality, non-contrast coronary imaging for MB detection with diagnostic performance comparable to CCTA. The combined approach offers complementary advantages.
More Related Videos
09:36A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Computational Protocol for Analysis of Plaque Morphology and Hemodynamics in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
Published on: August 12, 2025
04:40Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests