Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Axitinib and Long-Acting Octreotide in Advanced Extrapancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Randomized, Double-Blind,
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero1,2,3, Marta Benavent4, Paula Jimenez-Fonseca5
1Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Purpose:
Angiogenesis plays an essential role in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study evaluates efficacy and safety of axitinib in extrapancreatic (ep)-NETs.
Patients And Methods:
AXINET was an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II/III trial including patients age 18 years and older, with unresectable/metastatic G1-2 epNETs and up to two previous treatment lines. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to axitinib 5 mg or placebo, both orally twice a day, in combination with intramuscular octreotide long-acting release 30 mg once every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization was stratified by primary tumor site, Ki-67 index (≤5% or >5%), and time from diagnosis (> or ≤12 months). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Efficacy was also assessed by a blinded independent central review (BICR).
Results:
From October 2011 to May 2019, 256 patients were assigned to axitinib (n = 126) or placebo (n = 130). Investigator-assessed median PFS was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.6 to 24.7) versus 13.1 months (95% CI, 10.9 to 18.6) in the axitinib and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.15]). The median BICR PFS was 16.6 months (95% CI, 13.5 to 24.2) versus 9.9 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 13.9) in the axitinib and placebo groups, respectively (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.94], P = .017). Objective response rate (ORR) was significantly greater for axitinib per investigator assessment (17.5% v 4.6%; P = .001) and BICR (12.8% v 3.2%; P = .005). Most common grade ≥3 toxicities were hypertension (24.0% v 9.2%) and diarrhea (13.6% v 1.5%).
Conclusion:
Axitinib significantly increased PFS per BICR assessment and ORR both per investigator and BICR assessment compared with placebo, although the primary study end point was not met. Toxicity profile was manageable with no new safety concerns.
Insights
Axitinib improved progression-free survival and objective response rates in patients with extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (epNETs). While the primary endpoint wasn't met, axitinib demonstrated manageable safety in this clinical trial.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Research
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Angiogenesis is crucial in the development and progression of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).
- Extrapancreatic NETs (epNETs) represent a significant subset of NETs requiring effective treatment strategies.
- Targeting angiogenesis is a potential therapeutic approach for NETs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of axitinib in patients with unresectable or metastatic G1-2 extrapancreatic NETs (epNETs).
- To compare progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORR) between axitinib and placebo in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- The AXINET trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II/III study.
- Patients received either oral axitinib (5 mg twice daily) or placebo, combined with octreotide long-acting release.
- The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including blinded independent central review (BICR) assessments and ORR.
Main Results:
- Axitinib showed a trend towards improved investigator-assessed PFS (17.2 vs. 13.1 months), but did not meet the primary endpoint.
- BICR revealed a significant improvement in median PFS for axitinib (16.6 vs. 9.9 months; HR, 0.71; P = .017).
- Objective response rates (ORR) were significantly higher with axitinib compared to placebo, both by investigator (17.5% vs. 4.6%) and BICR (12.8% vs. 3.2%) assessments.
Conclusions:
- Axitinib significantly improved PFS based on BICR and ORR by both assessments compared to placebo in epNETs.
- Although the primary study endpoint was not met, axitinib demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile with no new safety concerns.
- Axitinib represents a potential therapeutic option for patients with advanced epNETs, warranting further consideration.
More Related Videos
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
06:08Establishment and Characterization of Patient-Derived Xenograft Models of Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: June 2, 2023