Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Femoral Bowing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Angular Deviation as a Primary Mediator of Poor Five-Year Function and
Hongtai Chen1, Pingjin Xie2, Chun Hoi Yan3
1Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Shenzhen Hospital of Shanghai, University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China.
Background:
Femoral bowing compromises intramedullary-guided distal femoral resection accuracy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet its impact on 5-year functional outcomes remains incompletely characterized. This study investigated whether bowing affects TKA outcomes through angular deviation during resection and established clinically actionable thresholds for risk stratification.
Methods:
This study analyzed 422 patients who underwent primary TKA with intramedullary-guided resection with 5-year follow-up. Femoral bowing angle (FBA), postoperative angular deviation of resection (postoperative-Δθ), alignment, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores were assessed. Pearson's correlation, multivariate linear regression, and mediation analyses evaluated mechanistic pathways, whereas receiver operating characteristic analyses established thresholds. Patients were stratified by thresholds for comparison.
Results:
The mean FBA was 1.4 ± 2.9° (range, -5.9 to 11.5), with 6.9% exhibiting severe bowing. The FBA correlated with postoperative-Δθ (r = 0.716) and negatively with 5-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (r = -0.363) (both P-values <0.001). Mediation analysis revealed that bowing's impact on improvement in functional outcomes is primarily through postoperative-Δθ (β = -0.356, P < 0.001), rather than mechanical alignment. The thresholds were established: |FBA| = 5.9° and |postoperative-Δθ| = 4.6° (both P-values <0.001). Patients who had severe bowing had worse pain and sports outcomes, whereas those who had unacceptable alignment deviation had worse daily living and quality of life outcomes (all P-values <0.05). Patients who had both severe bowing and unacceptable deviation fared worse across all scales compared to patients who had neither condition (all P-values <0.05).
Conclusions:
Bowing adversely affects TKA functional outcomes primarily through angular deviation during resection rather than through direct effects or alignment alone. The established thresholds provide |FBA| = 5.9° for preoperative risk stratification and |postoperative-Δθ| = 4.6° for intraoperative accuracy objective. For patients who have severe bowing, advanced surgical technologies to enhance resection accuracy may be warranted to optimize functional outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
08:15Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
Published on: February 17, 2023
