Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Cost-utility analysis of the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society conveyance algorithm for patients with
Guilherme Movio1, Uzma Sajjad1, Rupert Simpson1
1Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom; Anglia Ruskin School of Medicine & MTRC, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Insights
Implementing a new cardiac arrest algorithm for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients is cost-effective. This strategy improves resource efficiency and shows a high probability of cost-effectiveness at standard willingness-to-pay thresholds.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
- Public Health
Background:
- Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presents significant mortality and healthcare burdens.
- The British Cardiovascular Interventional Society's conveyance algorithm directs shockable rhythm patients to specialized Cardiac Arrest Centres for advanced care.
- This study assessed the economic impact of implementing this algorithm in a large region.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society's conveyance algorithm.
- To compare the algorithm's economic impact against standard care over a lifetime horizon.
Main Methods:
- A hybrid decision-analytic model (decision tree and Markov model) was employed.
- Data were sourced from a contemporary observational pilot study.
- Health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years) and costs were analyzed, with costs discounted at 3.5% annually.
Main Results:
- The conveyance algorithm demonstrated cost-effectiveness with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2,926 per quality-adjusted life year gained.
- Cost savings in intensive care, hospital wards, and ambulance services were observed, slightly offset by increased admission and longer-term care costs.
- Probabilistic analysis indicated an 86.0% likelihood of cost-effectiveness at a £35,000 per quality-adjusted life year willingness-to-pay threshold.
Conclusions:
- Selective, rhythm-based transfer to Cardiac Arrest Centres enhances resource efficiency with minimal added cost.
- While clinical outcomes require further investigation due to observational data limitations, the economic evaluation supports broader clinical and health system benefit studies.
- Further prospective, multi-centre research is recommended to validate these findings.
Background:
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with high mortality and substantial healthcare costs. The British Cardiovascular Interventional Society's conveyance algorithm prioritises direct transfer of patients with an initial shockable rhythm to specialist Cardiac Arrest Centres to support access to advanced cardiac intervention, neurocritical care, and structured rehabilitation. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of implementing the conveyance algorithm in a large regional population.
Methods:
A hybrid decision-analytic model, combining a decision tree and Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the algorithm, compared with standard of care over a lifetime horizon. Model inputs were derived from a contemporary, observational pilot study. Health outcomes were expressed in quality-adjusted life years, and healthcare costs were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and net monetary benefit.
Results:
The conveyance algorithm was cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2926 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Reductions in intensive care, hospital ward, post-assessment, and ambulance costs were partially offset by slightly higher costs related to admission, neuroprognostication, and longer-term care. Probabilistic analysis showed an 86.0% probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £35,000 per quality-adjusted life year.
Conclusion:
Selective rhythm-based transfer to specialist cardiac arrest centres improved resource efficiency with minimal additional cost. Although clinical outcome differences remain exploratory due to observational data, this economic evaluation supports further prospective, multi-centre evaluation to confirm broader clinical and health system benefits.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

