Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
Published on: January 26, 2024
Bridging the Communication Gap: Pragmatics and Interactional Dynamics in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children
Chiara Mazzocconi1,2,3, Céline Hidalgo1,2, Charlie Hallart4
1Inserm, INS, Institute Neurosciences Systèmes, Aix-Marseille University, France.
Purpose:
Children who are deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) often face challenges in everyday social communication, even when they achieve good auditory recovery through hearing technologies. These difficulties, particularly in pragmatic and interactional domains, can affect peer relationships, educational outcomes, and quality of life. This study aims to characterize interactional and discourse-level challenges in DHH children with functional auditory access to inform targeted interventions.
Method:
We analyzed dyadic child-adult interactions involving nine DHH and 13 typically hearing (TH) children (ages 6-11 years), all using oral language. The DHH group included users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs), bimodal devices (CI + hearing aid), and bilateral hearing aids. Each child interacted with an adult in a referential (treasure-hunting) task, alternated with child-led subtasks (e.g., storytelling). We adopted a multilevel analysis approach ranging from acoustics to pragmatics: acoustic features, turn-taking, laughter and their convergence, and dialogue acts.
Results:
Turn-taking and acoustic alignment (fundamental frequency, intensity, syllable rate) were similar across groups. However, dyads involving DHH children are less likely to complete the task, and DHH children produce significantly shorter turns and less speech laughter. They also showed significantly lower contingent responding to adult laughter and dialogue acts. Conversations with DHH children were more asymmetrical, with the adult speaking more, producing significantly longer turns, less laughter, and less laughter mimicry than when interacting with TH children.
Conclusions:
We provide a detailed, multilevel characterization of DHH conversational dynamics while interacting with a TH adult-whose behavior at times reduces interactional opportunities for the child. These findings highlight the dynamic nature of conversation and the importance of interventions that foster contingency, engagement, and mutual responsiveness to support DHH children's communicative development.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
10:11Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
Published on: December 14, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Language and Cognition
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.